2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70361-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Verbal Fluency Deficits in the Preclinical Stages of Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
(250 reference statements)
4
43
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In those studies that have found preclinical cognitive performance to be similar in VaD and AD, it must be acknowledged that the diagnostic outcomes are also similar (ie, both VaD and AD require memory deficits). 9,10,12,13 Although we did not replicate the findings of Jones et al 14 of poorer semantic category fluency in preclinical AD relative to preclinical VaD, we note that VCI is a heterogeneous condition and that different forms may well present with different prodromal cognitive profiles. For example, people with VaD who have significant subcortical pathology may be more impaired on tests of executive functioning and visual construction, whereas those with little subcortical pathology may be more impaired on tests of language and memory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In those studies that have found preclinical cognitive performance to be similar in VaD and AD, it must be acknowledged that the diagnostic outcomes are also similar (ie, both VaD and AD require memory deficits). 9,10,12,13 Although we did not replicate the findings of Jones et al 14 of poorer semantic category fluency in preclinical AD relative to preclinical VaD, we note that VCI is a heterogeneous condition and that different forms may well present with different prodromal cognitive profiles. For example, people with VaD who have significant subcortical pathology may be more impaired on tests of executive functioning and visual construction, whereas those with little subcortical pathology may be more impaired on tests of language and memory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Other groups have also shown that reductions in memory, as part of a more global pattern of impairment, precede diagnoses of both VaD and AD by up to 4 years. 9 -13 Although few differences in the preclinical cognitive profiles of these 2 conditions have been observed, 9,10,12, 13 Jones et al 14 found that semantic category fluency was more impaired in preclinical AD, whereas deficits in letter category fluency were present in both preclinical AD and VaD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no consensus in the literature about the performance in category fluency as being better or worse in VaD than in AD, with some authors reporting no differences 18 or even a reverse pattern, i.e., worse performance on this task in AD when compared to VaD 19 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) језичке способности; на примјер: Boston naming test -BNT (Kaplan, Goodglass, & Weintraub, 1983), Boston diagnostic aphasia examination -BDAE (Goodglass& ; разноврсни задаци вербалне флуентности, нарочито семантичке (Araujo et al, 2011;Gomez& White, 2006;Henry, Crawford, & Phillips, 2004;Jones, Laukka, & Bäckman, 2006) (Cummings et al, 1994), Geriatric Depression Scale -GDS (Yesavage, et al, 1983), Beck Anxiety Inventory -BAI (Beck & Steer, 1990), Beck Depression Inventory -BDI (Beck, Ward, Mendelson, Mock, &Erbaugh, 1961).…”
Section: Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test -Rbmtunclassified