2019
DOI: 10.1111/jar.12614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential reinforcement of high rates of behaviour to increase work productivity in adults with intellectual disability

Abstract: Background Due to deficits in adaptive and cognitive functioning, productivity may pose challenges for individuals with intellectual disability in the workplace. Method Using a changing‐criterion embedded in a multiple baseline across participants design, we examined the effects of differential reinforcement of high rates of behaviour (DRH) on the rate of data entry (i.e., productivity) in four adults with intellectual disability. Results Although the DRH procedure increased the rate of correct data entry in a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the participants' rate of correct responding increased but did not attain the same levels as would be expected from workers without disabilities. In a related study on productivity, our research team found that the mean rate of workers without disabilities was 31 correct responses per minute on the same tasks (McDuff et al, 2019). Whether or not society should expect individuals with disabilities to achieve the same level of productivity than their peers without disabilities remains open to debate (see Kirsh et al, 2009;Lysaght et al, 2012).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, the participants' rate of correct responding increased but did not attain the same levels as would be expected from workers without disabilities. In a related study on productivity, our research team found that the mean rate of workers without disabilities was 31 correct responses per minute on the same tasks (McDuff et al, 2019). Whether or not society should expect individuals with disabilities to achieve the same level of productivity than their peers without disabilities remains open to debate (see Kirsh et al, 2009;Lysaght et al, 2012).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%