2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00335-020-09851-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential protein input in the maternal diet alters the skeletal muscle transcriptome in fetal sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, few studies have examined potential effects of maternal protein intake on the overall miRNA expression of fetal skeletal muscle. We have previously reported that maternal diets differing in protein content alter fetal skeletal transcriptome, and maternal high protein compared standard protein triggered pathways related to the immune system and disease in sheep skeletal muscle [18]. On the other hand, the mechanisms by which these diets affect fetal miRNAome in sheep skeletal muscle are not known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, few studies have examined potential effects of maternal protein intake on the overall miRNA expression of fetal skeletal muscle. We have previously reported that maternal diets differing in protein content alter fetal skeletal transcriptome, and maternal high protein compared standard protein triggered pathways related to the immune system and disease in sheep skeletal muscle [18]. On the other hand, the mechanisms by which these diets affect fetal miRNAome in sheep skeletal muscle are not known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has examined extreme undernutrition or overnutrition conditions to test the effects of maternal nutrition on fetal development in livestock and model animals, including fetal programming of muscle and fat tissues [12,17,18]. However, few studies have examined potential effects of maternal protein intake on the overall miRNA expression of fetal skeletal muscle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MUN exerts its effect on the fetus by decreasing insulin sensitivity and promoting hypoxia [ 23 ]. Furthermore, MUN altered the gene expression profile in the fetal skeletal muscle tissue [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. These studies have suggested that alteration of fetal skeletal muscle metabolism caused by MUN is crucial for the muscle development, however, the effect of MUN on fetal skeletal muscle metabolism has been poorly elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, difference in the result of MUN not only between animal species, breeds, or organs, but also between skeletal muscle types can be observed [ 24 , 30 ]. Comparison of experimental conditions among previous studies suggests that the effect of MUN on skeletal muscle gene expression varies between early and middle-to-late pregnancy of dams, between energy and protein restriction, and between levels of nutrition [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Notably, no significant phenotypic effect was observed in skeletal muscle mass or BW, in cases that the MUN period was limited to early-to-middle gestation [ 12 ] or that the nutritional level was compared between 70 and 100% or between 85 and 140% in requirement of energy for maintenance [ 30 , 31 ], even with significant effect on muscle fiber numbers and/or gene expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it is currently accepted that the nutrition of parents widely affects the epigenetic modifications in progeny and therefore the expression of phenotypic characteristics in livestock (Murdoch et al 2016). Finally, transcriptomics is a well-integrated 'omics' area that comprises most of the research of nutrigenomics regarding ruminants (Osorio et al, 2017;Osorio et al, 2019;Sohel et al, 2020). Additional to the aforementioned three main areas, nutrigenomics also makes use of proteomics and metabolomics to create a total systems biology environment for a better understanding of nutrient-genome-phenotype interactions (Asmelash et al, 2018;Mondal and Ghosh, 2018;Müller and Kersten, 2003;Sales et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%