Differential parenting and children's social understanding

Abstract

In the current study, a curvilinear association was examined between differential parenting and children's social understanding as measured using standardized assessments and behavioral observations. Social understanding was comprised of theory-of-mind and behavior indicating understanding of others' minds (i.e., cognitive sensitivity and internal state talk and reasoning during sibling interactions). Data came from a community sample of 372 children (51.6% males; M age 5 5.57, SD 5 0.77), their younger siblings (M age 5 3.14, SD 5 0.27), and their mothers who were observed in their homes. We hypothesized that in families with higher levels of differential parenting, both favored and disfavored older siblings would display poorer social understanding, but that disfavored children would be more negatively impacted. Results from a hierarchical regression analysis indicated an inverse linear effect, rather than a curvilinear relationship, between being favored by mother and siblings' social understanding. Specifically, disfavored older children showed higher levels of social understanding when interacting with their favored younger sibling. This relationship remained significant after controlling for variables such as age, SES, and language. Findings suggest that differential parenting plays a role in children's ability to understand others. K E Y W O R D Sparent-child relations, social cognition, theory of mind

“My Brother Was His Little Angel; I Was the Problem Child”: Perceived Sibling Favoritism in the Narratives of Youth Who Become Homeless

“…The nature of the parent–child relationship is important to consider (Pauker, Perlman, Prime, & Jenkins, 2017), and research has shown that this relationship worsens for the sibling who is disfavored (Boll et al, 2003). Likewise, the relationship between siblings is negatively affected when one is treated differently.…”

Is overparenting harmful to creativity?

“…This relationship emphasizes moderate parental control (Pauker, Perlman, Prime, & Jenkins, 2017). Moreover, empirical studies have shown that children tend to develop best under moderate parental control, behave in a more deviant manner under low parental control (because of inadequate parental attention and supervision), and develop rebellious attitudes and experience developmental problems under high parental control (because it restricts their autonomy and independent thinking).…”

“…The nonlinear relationship between parenting and children's development has received growing attention; related topics include the U‐shaped relationship and threshold effect (Kokkinos, Antoniadou, Asdre, & Voulgaridou, ; Segrin, Woszidlo, Givertz, Bauer, & Taylor Murphy, ). This relationship emphasizes moderate parental control (Pauker, Perlman, Prime, & Jenkins, ). Moreover, empirical studies have shown that children tend to develop best under moderate parental control, behave in a more deviant manner under low parental control (because of inadequate parental attention and supervision), and develop rebellious attitudes and experience developmental problems under high parental control (because it restricts their autonomy and independent thinking).…”

Correlation between Elegance of Parenting and Emotional Intelligence among Chinese Elementary School Students

“…Permissive parents tend to be very loving, yet provide less guidelines and rules. In this type of parenting the parents do not expect mature behavior from their children and often seem more like a friend than a parental figure (Ogunleye et al,2013;Pauker et al, 2017). Emotional intelligence refers to the capability of a person to manage and control his emotions for performing the specific task.…”

“…Emotional intelligence refers to the capability of a person to manage and control his emotions for performing the specific task. In educational context emotional intelligence is a skill that identify the positive emotions and understandings that contribute the academic success of the students (Cotton & Wikelund, 2001;Pauker et al, 2017). The Goleman (2001) and Gardner (1993) theories of emotional intelligence have elicited great interest both in the academic and the non-academic world.…”