1999
DOI: 10.1002/stem.170152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Kinetics of Primitive Hematopoietic Cells Assayed In Vitro and In Vivo During Serum‐Free Suspension Culture of CD34 + Blood Progenitor Cells

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(53 reference statements)
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BM cells were obtained by flushing the femurs of donor P-selectin-deficient mice in C57BL/6J background (Charles River) as described previously (28). Recipient C57BL/6J mice received lethal irradiation doses at 4 -6 weeks of age, and animals received i.v.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BM cells were obtained by flushing the femurs of donor P-selectin-deficient mice in C57BL/6J background (Charles River) as described previously (28). Recipient C57BL/6J mice received lethal irradiation doses at 4 -6 weeks of age, and animals received i.v.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results obtained from stroma-based 1 and stroma-free ex vivo culture systems [2][3][4][5] have been disappointing, owing to insufficient activation of primitive CD34 ϩ CD38 Ϫ cells, cell differentiation, and a loss of repopulating capacity following short-term culture. 6 Moreover, increased CD34 ϩ cell numbers, colony-forming cells (CFCs), and long-term culture initiating cells (LTC-ICs) are not quantitative indicators of in vivo repopulating potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Of note, both the murine studies and the studies by Gan et al were performed in the absence of exogenous cytokines, which would have been expected to drive differentiation. [4][5][6] In our studies, we supplemented HUBEC monolayers with a cytokine combination, which maximally induced progenitor cell division, and despite this, we observed a measurable increase in SRCs over time. Since exposure to GM-CSF plus IL-3 plus IL-6 plus SCF plus flt-3 ligand in the absence of HUBECs caused a decline in detectable SRCs over 7 days of culture, we postulate that HUBECs may have protected ABM SRCs from differentiation during exposure to cytokines while also supporting the self-renewal of this primitive population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of correlation between SRC and expanded CD34 + cells, CFU and LTC-IC have been demonstrated by various groups. [25][26][27] In spite of the suggestions that human CFU and week-6 CAFC/LTC-IC assays detect highly overlapping populations, 22,23 it remains unclear whether SRC represents an exclusive subset of pluripotent stem cells. Ex vivo expansion of cord blood stem cells has been suggested as a strategy to increase the quantity of progenitor cells required for a successful transplant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%