1969
DOI: 10.1037/h0027728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential group counseling with male college underachievers: A three-year follow-up.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cluster analysis and supporting interview data suggest the possibility of a differential approach to treating underachievers in accord with some recent counseling studies (Brown, 1969;Chestnut & Gilbreath, 1969;Mandel, Roth, & Berenbaum, 1968;Roth et al, 1967). The interview data suggest the possibility that the conservative Ul's might be attracted toi skill-improvement oriented programs while the U2's would find attractive groups dealing directly with identity issues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cluster analysis and supporting interview data suggest the possibility of a differential approach to treating underachievers in accord with some recent counseling studies (Brown, 1969;Chestnut & Gilbreath, 1969;Mandel, Roth, & Berenbaum, 1968;Roth et al, 1967). The interview data suggest the possibility that the conservative Ul's might be attracted toi skill-improvement oriented programs while the U2's would find attractive groups dealing directly with identity issues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Thus, a plethora of studies correlate some trait-impulsivity, independence, for example--with underachievement without any attempt to see whether a combination of these traits makes sense in an actual individual (Lavin, 1965). More recently, successful attempts have been made at differentiating underachievers using various multivariate techniques (Kisch, 1968;Middleton & Guthrie, 1959), and several counselors have described treatment programs that take differences into account (Brown, 1969;Chestnut & Gilbreath, 1969;Gilbreath, 1968;Mandel, Roth, & Berenbaum, 1968;Roth et al, 1967).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%