1995
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9452(95)04147-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential estrogenic activities of male and female plant extracts from two dioecious species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EC 50 determined for E 2 (2 nM) was similar to that found by Chen et al (1997) and Maier et al (1995), which was about one order of magnitude higher than that observed by Gaido et al (1997) and Arnold et al (1996). As noted before, there were some modifications for the yeast-based assay in this study.…”
Section: à11supporting
confidence: 65%
“…EC 50 determined for E 2 (2 nM) was similar to that found by Chen et al (1997) and Maier et al (1995), which was about one order of magnitude higher than that observed by Gaido et al (1997) and Arnold et al (1996). As noted before, there were some modifications for the yeast-based assay in this study.…”
Section: à11supporting
confidence: 65%
“…The possibility that phytoestrogens might possess "estrogenic" functions within the plant is, therefore, perhaps fanciful. Nevertheless, preliminary data from the "osage orange" (Maclura pomifera, Moraceae) indicate that male and female branches of this dioecious species contain very different levels of a compound(s) able to activate human ER in yeast (124). M. pomifera fruit contain up to 6% dry mass of the di-prenylated isoflavone derivatives pomiferin and osajin, with smaller amounts of prenylated isoflavones and flavones with known in vitro ER activation activity in other parts of the plant (111).…”
Section: Phytoestrogens and Sex Determination In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common name is derived from its fruit, which resembles the shape of an orange (Prokudina et al, 2011). The fruit is not edible for humans, its extract exhibits antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, antidiabetic, estrogenic, antimalarial and anti-insect activities, and the Native Americans have used M. pomifera for cancer treatment (Franova and Pavlik, 2007;Hay et al, 2004;Küpeli et al, 2006;Mahmoud, 1981;Maier et al, 1995;Peterson et al, 2000Peterson et al, , 2002. Several phenolic compounds have been isolated and identified from various parts of this plant, namely isoflavonoids from fruit (Delle Monache et al, 1994;Tian et al, 2006;Wolfrom et al, 1946), flavonols and xanthones from the heartwood and stem bark (Deshpande et al, 1975;Laidlaw and Smith, 1959), and flavanones and xanthones from the root bark (Delle Monache et al, 1984;Wolfrom et al, 1965).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%