Differential Effects of Repetition on True and False Recognition

Tussing, Audrey A.; Greene, Robert L.

doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2636

Cited by 51 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Whereas control subjects exhibited decreasing false recognition rates across the five study-test trials, (Korsakoff) amnesics exhibited increasing false recognition rates. The control subject results are consistent with the results of previous recognition and free recall studies in which normal healthy volunteers showed increasing true recognition-recall rates, but decreasing false recognition-recall rates as a function of repeated exposure (e.g., McDermott, 1996;Tussing & Greene, 1999;but cf. Tussing & Greene, 1997).…”

supporting

confidence: 91%

“…Therefore, a decrease in false recognition as a function of number of study presentations could be predicted by SAM if the differentiation mechanism prevails (cf. Tussing & Greene, 1999). In this framework, the finding of decreased false recognition for twice-vs. oncepresented lists in the placebo condition, but increased false recognition for twice-vs. once presented lists in the triazolam condition suggests that triazolam impairs the operation of the differentiation mechanism.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 85%

See 1 more Smart Citation

False Recognition in Triazolam-Induced Amnesia

Mintzer

Griffiths

2001

Journal of Memory and Language

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

supporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 85%

False Recognition in Triazolam-Induced Amnesia

Mintzer

Griffiths

2001

Journal of Memory and Language

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Thus, if critical items are activated at study, they do not behave in a manner similar to that for list items. Data from other laboratories support this conclusion as well; for instance, repetition affects the recognition of critical and studied items in somewhat different ways (e.g., Tussing & Greene, 1999).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 82%

Part-set cuing of false memories

Reysen

Nairne

2002

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Part-set cuing inhibition describes the common finding that re-presenting items from a word list can reduce subjects' overall recall performance for studied items. Do part-set cuing effects occur for false memories as well? In the present experiments, subjects studied lists of words drawn from Roediger and McDermott (1995). After studying each list, subjects completed math problems and then recalled the list items either with or without accompanying list cues. In Experiment 1, the recall cues consisted of items drawn randomly from the original list. In Experiment 2, an additional type of cued recall task was added in which the even numbered list items were used as cues. Taken together, these experiments demonstrate robust part-set cuing effects for critical nonpresented items. In addition, they show that whereas recall of critical words is reduced by the presence of cues at test, retrieval cues do not affect critical words and studied words in exactly the same manner.

show abstract

“…Repetition as a means of increasing learning has been applied with the DRM paradigm as an experimental manipulation to investigate the mechanisms underlying false memories (Benjamin 2001). Repetition at encoding has been shown to increase false memories (Benjamin 2001), decrease false memories (Tussing and Greene 1997), have no effect on false memories (Tussing and Greene 1999) and affect false memories in an inverted U-shaped function (Seamon et al 2002). As repetition may both increase false memories via increased activation of semantically associated non-studied items, and decrease false memories through increased monitoring, observing the effect of repetition on false memory levels can provide insight into whether activation or monitoring processes are prevailing in memory judgements.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of alcohol and repetition at encoding on implicit and explicit false memories

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article (Unspecified) http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Garfinkel, S.N., Dienes, Zoltán and Duka, Theodora (2006) The effect of alcohol and repetition at encoding on implicit and explicit false memories. Psychopharmacology, 188 (4). pp. [498][499][500][501][502][503][504][505][506][507][508] This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/13733/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse:Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University.Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available.Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way.

show abstract

Differential Effects of Repetition on True and False Recognition

Cited by 51 publications

References 20 publications

False Recognition in Triazolam-Induced Amnesia

False Recognition in Triazolam-Induced Amnesia

Part-set cuing of false memories

The effect of alcohol and repetition at encoding on implicit and explicit false memories

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About