1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf00426110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of chlordiazepoxide and d-amphetamine on responding maintained by a DRL schedule of reinforcement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
16
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, it has been suggested that DA can modulate this internal clock. For instance, systemic administration of methamphetamine or amphetamine in rodents increases internal clock speed, resulting in an overestimation of how much time has passed and thus, faster response times [4143]. In the current study, intra-NAc amphetamine could have altered the rats’ perception of the delay durations; however, the fact that intra-NAc amphetamine had different effects on choice performance depending on the direction of the delays does not support this interpretation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Interestingly, it has been suggested that DA can modulate this internal clock. For instance, systemic administration of methamphetamine or amphetamine in rodents increases internal clock speed, resulting in an overestimation of how much time has passed and thus, faster response times [4143]. In the current study, intra-NAc amphetamine could have altered the rats’ perception of the delay durations; however, the fact that intra-NAc amphetamine had different effects on choice performance depending on the direction of the delays does not support this interpretation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…This is consistent with previous research suggesting that benzodiazepines can produce rate-dependent effects on certain types of operant behavior. For example, CDP was found to increase overall response rates under differential reinforcement of low rate (DRL) (Sanger et al 1974) and variable-interval (VI) schedules (Sanger and Blackman 1981), but was found to decrease high rates of responding under FR schedules. Interestingly, the specificity of this rate-dependent effect was demonstrated by the fact that CDP did not produce rate-dependent effects under FR schedules that engendered low rates of responding; that is, decreasing the baseline rates of responding by lowering the ratio size did not alter the rate-decreasing effects of CDP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Electrophysiological and biochemical studies show that SB242,084 increases VTA cell firing, leading to increased DA release within the nucleus accumbens (Di Matteo et al 1999). Since procedures likely to elevate accumbens DA function, such as systemic or intra-accumbens injections of amphetamine, increase premature responding in the 5-CSRTT (Cole and Robbins 1987), and reduce IRT and efficiency in DRL tasks (Sanger et al 1974), the action of SB242,084 to disinhibit responding may result from indirect activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%