1992
DOI: 10.1136/vr.131.9.199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential diagnosis of rinderpest and PPR using biotinylated cDNA probes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RT-PCR, simple and aqueous phase ELISA (SNAP-ELISA) and nucleic acid hybridization have also been used for the detection and differentiation of PPRV [35,43,53,54,105,127]. RT-PCR and cDNA hybridization techniques are the two sensitive means to diagnose the PPRV infection, but are time consuming and cumbersome for routine diagnosis with a large sample size.…”
Section: Nucleic Acid Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…RT-PCR, simple and aqueous phase ELISA (SNAP-ELISA) and nucleic acid hybridization have also been used for the detection and differentiation of PPRV [35,43,53,54,105,127]. RT-PCR and cDNA hybridization techniques are the two sensitive means to diagnose the PPRV infection, but are time consuming and cumbersome for routine diagnosis with a large sample size.…”
Section: Nucleic Acid Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RT-PCR and cDNA hybridization techniques are the two sensitive means to diagnose the PPRV infection, but are time consuming and cumbersome for routine diagnosis with a large sample size. Nucleic acid hybridization is also suitable for providing diagnosis utilizing field materials, which are either collected from the putrefied or semi-putrefied carcasses or get putrefied during transit period [41,105]. Diallo et al [41].…”
Section: Nucleic Acid Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations