1989
DOI: 10.1128/aem.55.6.1386-1390.1989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential depuration of poliovirus, Escherichia coli, and a coliphage by the common mussel, Mytilus edulis

Abstract: The elimination of sewage effluent-associated poliovirus, Escherichia coli, and a 22-nm icosahedral coliphage by the common mussel, Mytilus edulis, was studied. Both laboratoryand commercial-scale recirculating, UV depuration systems were used in this study. In the laboratory system, the logarithms of the poliovirus, E. coli, and coliphage levels were reduced by 1.86, 2.9, and 2.16, respectively, within 52 h of depuration. The relative patterns and rates of elimination of the three organisms suggest that they … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with those of Selegean et al (2001) who conducted a similar experiment but on freshwater mussels contaminated by a WWTP effluent. Moreover, these results suggest that under these experimental conditions, the depuration process leading to the elimination of E. coli by defecation and lysozomal digestion of microorganisms (McHenery et al, 1979;Power and Collins, 1989;Love et al, 2010) from oyster tissues is not yet finished after 2 weeks. This depuration time is longer than those observed in depuration experiments in which fecally-contaminated oysters were allowed to depurate from E. coli in non-contaminated seawater (Buisson et al, 1981;Doré and Lees, 1995;Selegean et al, 2001;Pommepuy et al, 2003;Love et al, 2010), while in our experiment, oysters remained in fecally-contaminated water until ca.…”
Section: Oystersmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These results are in agreement with those of Selegean et al (2001) who conducted a similar experiment but on freshwater mussels contaminated by a WWTP effluent. Moreover, these results suggest that under these experimental conditions, the depuration process leading to the elimination of E. coli by defecation and lysozomal digestion of microorganisms (McHenery et al, 1979;Power and Collins, 1989;Love et al, 2010) from oyster tissues is not yet finished after 2 weeks. This depuration time is longer than those observed in depuration experiments in which fecally-contaminated oysters were allowed to depurate from E. coli in non-contaminated seawater (Buisson et al, 1981;Doré and Lees, 1995;Selegean et al, 2001;Pommepuy et al, 2003;Love et al, 2010), while in our experiment, oysters remained in fecally-contaminated water until ca.…”
Section: Oystersmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…the simultaneous depuration of HAV and PV from mussels, Mytilus chilensis ) have shown that different viruses are eliminated at distinct rates (Sobsey et al. 1987; Power and Collins 1989; Enriquez et al. 1992; Schwab et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FRNA phages in particular have been described as promising candidates to evaluate the virological quality of shellfish (Lees, 2000). Several studies have shown a correlation between the elimination kinetics of F+ RNA phages and those of enteric viruses (Dore and Lees, 1995;Power and Collins, 1989;Power and Collins, 1990). Nevertheless reports on discrepancies in the occurrences of FRNA phages and pathogenic viruses are frequent.…”
Section: Methods For Detecting Viruses In Molluscan Shellfish and Assmentioning
confidence: 99%