2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Denaturation of Serum Proteome Reveals a Significant Amount of Hidden Information in Complex Mixtures of Proteins

Abstract: Recently developed proteomic technologies allow to profile thousands of proteins within a high-throughput approach towards biomarker discovery, although results are not as satisfactory as expected. In the present study we demonstrate that serum proteome denaturation is a key underestimated feature; in fact, a new differential denaturation protocol better discriminates serum proteins according to their electrophoretic mobility as compared to single-denaturation protocols. Sixty nine different denaturation treat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six CSF samples obtained from three MS patients representative of the MSlow group and three MS patients representative of the MShigh patients, according to the immunoassay (BioPlex) CSF profiling as described above (Table S2), were selected and analyzed using TRIDENT analysis with denaturation by three different protocols as previously described and fully explained in Data S1. The obtained protein datasets for each experiment were analyzed by Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID, v6.8) software (https://david.ncifcrf.gov), and gene ontology analyses and protein–protein interactions using STRING software as described in detail in Data S1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six CSF samples obtained from three MS patients representative of the MSlow group and three MS patients representative of the MShigh patients, according to the immunoassay (BioPlex) CSF profiling as described above (Table S2), were selected and analyzed using TRIDENT analysis with denaturation by three different protocols as previously described and fully explained in Data S1. The obtained protein datasets for each experiment were analyzed by Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID, v6.8) software (https://david.ncifcrf.gov), and gene ontology analyses and protein–protein interactions using STRING software as described in detail in Data S1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endogenous TEX101 protein present in pooled seminal plasma was used to calibrate the assay. Because limit of detection (LOD) of the immunoassay without seminal plasma pretreatment was not high enough, we examined literature (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) to identify conditions that would improve the assay sensitivity in seminal plasma. Thus, seminal plasma was subjected to pretreatment with the following detergents, salts and solvents: 1% SDS, 2-5% Triton X-100, 1% CHAPS, 2% sodium deoxycholate, 1 M urea, 3 M guanidine hydrochloride, 10% dimethyl sulfoxide, 10% dimethylformamide, 10% glycerol, 10% methanol, 10% acetonitrile.…”
Section: Production Purification and Analysis Of Recombinant Human mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data acquisition and analysis was performed as previously described [16][17]. Data were searched with 1.5 Da and 1 Da tolerance respectively for precursor and fragment ions.…”
Section: Mass Spectrometry and Protein Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%