1971
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(71)91008-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential cross sections for the 2H(γ, p)n reaction between 25 and 55 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 (ii) Our backward cross section is in disagreement with the extrapolated photodisintegration data and with potential model calculations. We wish to thank the cyclotron crew for efficiently running the machine, and the staff of the mechanics and electronics workshops, especially R. Versin and B. de Callatay, for their qualified work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 (ii) Our backward cross section is in disagreement with the extrapolated photodisintegration data and with potential model calculations. We wish to thank the cyclotron crew for efficiently running the machine, and the staff of the mechanics and electronics workshops, especially R. Versin and B. de Callatay, for their qualified work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The hydrogen volume and vacuum vessel were bounded by 12-/xm-thick Havar windows upstream, and by Mylar windows downstream of the neutron beam. 8 The high-energy part of the spectrum was selected by time of flight (TOF) between a capacitive beam pickoff located in front of the Li target, and a thin (0.2 mm) plastic scintillator (START). This spectrum is dominated by a monokinetic (72 ± 1 MeV) neutron peak, of intensity 2xl0 6 sec"" 1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The results obtained for the coefficients 8; /0, (i =2, 3,4) are reported in Fig. 9, together with the RSC and DTS-8 theoretical predictions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The observed proton and deuteron spectra were each converted to photon spectra using previously measured cross sections. For 2H(7,p)n, the results given by Weissman and Schultz [30] (E~=27-55 MeV) and by Galey [313 (E~=50-90 MeV) were adopted. These two measurements are in agreement within their ~ +_7 % errors in their (small) region of overlap, but, it should be noted, are consistently higher (by as much as ~30%) than earlier results [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%