2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential control of H-reflex amplitude in different weight-bearing conditions in young and elderly subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both, sheep and horses were standing during the measurements and therefore the limbs were weight bearing while the dogs were positioned in lateral recumbency and any muscle activity was avoided. A silent background EMG was mandatory in all studies to start the stimulation process and any reflex facilitation due to active muscle contraction prior to stimulation could be excluded [27]. Interestingly, when Rossi et al [28] stimulated electrically the sole of the foot of human volunteers at pain threshold intensity in standing position the reflex response decreased with increasing weight on the stimulated limb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both, sheep and horses were standing during the measurements and therefore the limbs were weight bearing while the dogs were positioned in lateral recumbency and any muscle activity was avoided. A silent background EMG was mandatory in all studies to start the stimulation process and any reflex facilitation due to active muscle contraction prior to stimulation could be excluded [27]. Interestingly, when Rossi et al [28] stimulated electrically the sole of the foot of human volunteers at pain threshold intensity in standing position the reflex response decreased with increasing weight on the stimulated limb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is unknown whether the pressure applied on the stimulation electrode influences the evoked potentials and the pain experienced by subjects. This methodological issue was rarely mentioned, suggesting that the investigators did not apply pressure on the stimulation electrode while eliciting the evoked potentials (Oya et al, 2008;Pinar et al, 2010;Tsuruike et al, 2012;Behrens et al, 2015;Mezzarane et al, 2015;Stutzig & Siebert, 2016a,b). In some studies, although pressure on the stimulation electrode was applied using adhesive tape and/or straps (Capaday & Stein, 1986;Duclay & Martin, 2005;Sefton et al, 2007;Querry et al, 2008;Cattagni et al, 2014;Baudry et al, 2015), the physiological rationale behind this manipulation was not specified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work reported an increase in leg muscle activity during upright standing in elderly adults (Laughton et al 2003, Tsuruike et al 2012) that should be supplied by an increased descending drive compared with young adults. However, no study has compared the excitability of the corticospinal pathway projecting to soleus during upright standing between young and elderly adults.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…, Tsuruike et al . ) that should be supplied by an increased descending drive compared with young adults. However, no study has compared the excitability of the corticospinal pathway projecting to soleus during upright standing between young and elderly adults.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%