2015
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential contribution of demographic rate synchrony to population synchrony in barn swallows

Abstract: Populations of many species show temporally synchronous dynamics over some range, mostly caused by spatial autocorrelation of the environment that affects demographic rates. Synchronous fluctuation of a demographic rate is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for population synchrony because population growth is differentially sensitive to variation in demographic rates. Little is known about the relative effects of demographic rates to population synchrony, because it is rare that all demographic rates f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), examine spatiotemporal demography (Schaub et al. ), or assess the community dynamics of interacting species (Péron and Koons ). Integrated analyses cannot guarantee improved inference, however, and as is always the case, careful thought and testing of assumptions must be practiced in order to construct useful and unbiased models (Abadi et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), examine spatiotemporal demography (Schaub et al. ), or assess the community dynamics of interacting species (Péron and Koons ). Integrated analyses cannot guarantee improved inference, however, and as is always the case, careful thought and testing of assumptions must be practiced in order to construct useful and unbiased models (Abadi et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We modelled the observation process as a normal distribution conditional on the state process:ytNormalfalse(N1,t+Nnormalad,t+Nnormalim,t,0.166667em0.166667emτobsfalse)where y t is the number of observed breeding pairs in year t and τ obs is the sampling error or variance in annual detection probabilities. To estimate apparent survival probabilities from individual mark–resight data, we used a Cormack–Jolly–Seber open‐population live‐recapture formulation (Kéry & Schaub, ; Schaub, von Hirschheydt, & Grüebler, ). We estimated survival probabilities by assuming that annual survival during the first year of life (Φ juv, t ) was different from annual survival for birds older than 1 year (Φ ad, t ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we instead evaluated fit of the CJS and Poisson models to the individual CR and reproductive success data sets52. Fit of the CJS model was evaluated using the Freeman-Tukey statistic53 and fit of the Poisson model was evaluated using the Chi-square discrepancy measure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%