2008
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-0461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Cellular Internalization of Anti-CD19 and -CD22 Immunotoxins Results in Different Cytotoxic Activity

Abstract: B-cell malignancies routinely express surface antigens CD19 and CD22. Immunotoxins against both antigens have been evaluated, and the immunotoxins targeting CD22 are more active. To understand this disparity in cytotoxicity and guide the screening of therapeutic targets, we compared two immunotoxins, FMC63(Fv)-PE38-targeting CD19 and RFB4(Fv)-PE38 (BL22)-targeting CD22. Six lymphoma cell lines have 4-to 9-fold more binding sites per cell for CD19 than for CD22, but BL22 is 4-to 140-fold more active than FMC63(… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
110
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
110
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This concept, however, has recently been challenged, as potent and selective anticancer activity has been observed with ADCs and SMDCs specific to antigens, which do not internalize [19,20,[28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concept, however, has recently been challenged, as potent and selective anticancer activity has been observed with ADCs and SMDCs specific to antigens, which do not internalize [19,20,[28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some native toxins such as ricin, intracellular delivery is achieved through lectin binding, followed by internalization and toxin release with membrane fusion or retrograde trafficking (5). Immunotoxins attempt to recreate this scenario by replacing the indiscriminate lectin binding with cancer-specific antigen binding as a means of targeting and internalization (6). Subsequent intracellular trafficking, release, and endosomal escape are often achieved using existing toxin characteristics, translocation domains, protease cleavage sites, disulfide bonds, and/or signaling peptides (7)(8)(9)(10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no competing ligand for CD19 as there is for CD21. Importantly, it is known that the majority of CD19-antibody complexes remain on or recycle to the surface of B cells even after extended periods (30,31). Furthermore, coligation of CD19 to the BCR lowers the activation threshold of B cells (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%