1996
DOI: 10.1086/118088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Binary Star Photometry Using the Adaptive Optics System at Starfire Optical Range

Abstract: As part of an NSF effort to make the Starfire Optical Range 1.5-m telescope, equipped with laser guide star and adaptive optics, available to the astronomical community, several nights in May and October of 1995 were awarded to the CHARA group in order to perform differential photometry on close binary stars. Images were acquired in two near-IR pass bands of over twenty pairs and reduced by fitting both the point spread function (PSF) and the positions and intensities of the stars. The ∆m values were calibrate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pipeline processing produces an image of the object in each of 23 wave bands resulting in a data cube. For the unocculted data cubes, we measured the binary star astrometry on each of the individual image frames with the program FITSTARS; it uses an iterative blind deconvolution that fits the location of delta functions and their relative intensity to the data (ten Brummelaar et al 1996(ten Brummelaar et al , 2000. After throwing out any image frames that failed to converge to a physical solution, the position angle and separation were computed as the weighted mean of the results from all the frames.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pipeline processing produces an image of the object in each of 23 wave bands resulting in a data cube. For the unocculted data cubes, we measured the binary star astrometry on each of the individual image frames with the program FITSTARS; it uses an iterative blind deconvolution that fits the location of delta functions and their relative intensity to the data (ten Brummelaar et al 1996(ten Brummelaar et al , 2000. After throwing out any image frames that failed to converge to a physical solution, the position angle and separation were computed as the weighted mean of the results from all the frames.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is similar to what the routine fitstars, presented in ten Brummelaar et al (1996Brummelaar et al ( , 2000, does to calculate the photometry of binaries. In the following paragraphs we describe this method in more detail.…”
Section: Photometry With Irdismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detection system with higher angular resolution (e.g., long-baseline optical interferometry) or more dynamic sensitivity (e.g., adaptive optics) is encouraged. The *m limitations of past adaptive optics work (e.g., ten Brummelaar et al 1996Brummelaar et al , 2000 have been largely self-imposed, the result of observing known binaries with relatively small magnitude di †erences. Recent work by Turner et al (2001) reports investigating nearby …”
Section: Calibration and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%