2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential behavioral profiling of stimulant substances in the rat using the LABORAS™ system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we evaluated horizontal, vertical activity and distance travelled in standard motor activity cages, while in the other two studies, motor activity was quantified as number of crossings between any of the eight sections within the behavioural pattern monitor and by a descriptive statistic (spatial d) that calculated the spatial structure of locomotor paths (Halberstadt et al, ), or by trajectory length in cm (corrected for deviations less than 3 cm) over 5 min time blocks during 30 min sessions (Horsley et al, ). Remarkably, irrespective of the specific motor parameter affected by MXE and of the direction of its effects, all of the three studies indicated a biphasic effect of MXE on locomotor activity, as previously reported for ketamine and MK‐801 (Castagné et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In particular, we evaluated horizontal, vertical activity and distance travelled in standard motor activity cages, while in the other two studies, motor activity was quantified as number of crossings between any of the eight sections within the behavioural pattern monitor and by a descriptive statistic (spatial d) that calculated the spatial structure of locomotor paths (Halberstadt et al, ), or by trajectory length in cm (corrected for deviations less than 3 cm) over 5 min time blocks during 30 min sessions (Horsley et al, ). Remarkably, irrespective of the specific motor parameter affected by MXE and of the direction of its effects, all of the three studies indicated a biphasic effect of MXE on locomotor activity, as previously reported for ketamine and MK‐801 (Castagné et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Ambulatory activity measurements can be automated using photobeam arrays [ 15 ; 16 ; 17 ; 18 ; 19 ; 20 ], a passive infrared sensor [ 21 ; 22 ], a stabilimeter (‘rocking cage’/’jiggle box’) [ 15 ; 23 ] or birds-eye videotracking [ 24 ; 25 ; 26 ; 27 ]. A wider set of behaviors can be detected using pressure sensors beneath the cage [ 28 ; 29 ; 30 ] or by videoanalysis software [ 31 ]. These automated methods necessitate the rats, which are social animals [ 32 ; 33 ], to be singly housed, typically in bespoke cages, and generally on bench tops rather than cage racks, requiring dedicated space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the antinociceptive synergism between curcumin and metformin in the formalin test, we evaluated the effects of individual compounds and their combination on motor coordination and short-term locomotor activity in naïve male-ICR mice. Measurement of locomotor activity allows us to determine whether the combination has potential side effects, either sedative or CNS stimulative 60 , 61 . The compounds in monotherapy or combination therapy were tested at the highest doses used in the formalin test (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%