2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different topological organization of human brain functional networks with eyes open versus eyes closed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
123
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
20
123
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have been able to find all networks in both states (Xu et al, 2014). Patriat et al (2013) reported differences between states, but comparison to this study is difficult as they used correlation between regions of interest rather than per-voxel metrics in defined networks.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have been able to find all networks in both states (Xu et al, 2014). Patriat et al (2013) reported differences between states, but comparison to this study is difficult as they used correlation between regions of interest rather than per-voxel metrics in defined networks.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, unlike this study, those studies were interested in local differences so justifiably discarded the mean of each R-fMRI metric with each conditions through performing statistical parametric mapping using the general linear model (Bianciardi et al, 2009;Brandt, 2006;Gonzalez-Hernandez et al, 2005;Marx et al, 2004;Qin et al, 2012;Riedl et al, 2014;Wicker et al, 2003), performing global signal regression to find local significance (Xu et al, 2014;Yuan et al, 2014;Zou et al, 2009), or using paired T-tests on a per voxel basis (which can hypothetically detect a global change if region-to-region variation is small, but will not necessarily as it only compares per-voxel changes and global means are never calculated) (Patriat et al, 2013). All of these methods will amplify local region to region, voxel to voxel variation, but obscure the relations to the global change observed in FDG (Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the use of global connectivity measures with 266 nodes could miss more focused abnormalities. An additional limitation may be the instructions provided to the subjects in that 'eyes open' vs 'eyes closed' have yielded different findings in the literature (Xu et al, 2014;Patriat et al, 2013), although in this study all subjects were provided with the same instructions. An additional limitation is that our findings may be influenced by factors such as substance use or smoking history.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We chose the closed-eyes modality to avoid highly noisy signals coming from the visual cortex [53] and to facilitate attention during interoceptive processing [54,55]. Moreover, this time window enabled us to obtain enough signal points for data analysis and to ensure that the patients would go through the whole protocol (see electronic supplementary material, §1.3.1).…”
Section: (C) Image Analysis (I) Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%