2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different relations between schedule-induced polydipsia and impulsive behaviour in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat and in high impulsive Wistar rats: Questioning the role of impulsivity in adjunctive behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, SHRs maintained their adjunctive drinking despite a reduction in feeding rate. These results are consistent with previous reports (Íbias & Pellón, 2011, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, SHRs maintained their adjunctive drinking despite a reduction in feeding rate. These results are consistent with previous reports (Íbias & Pellón, 2011, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This learning deficit relates to other deficits observed in WKY rats under a variety of different behavioural tasks (e.g., McAuley et al, 2009). Conversely, SHRs developed SIP quicker than Wistar controls, and this could reflect less competition for expression from other behaviours within inter-food intervals (Íbias & Pellón, 2011) and/or an increased hyperactivity (Íbias & Pellón, 2014). Overall the present results seem to reflect that the functionality of SIP is more in line with adjustments of behaviour to reinforcement intermittency (see Falk, 1971; Killeen & Pellón, 2013) rather than with an anxiety-reduction function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the RHA and RLA strains are well-characterized phenotypes that show rapid vs extremely poor acquisition of active avoidance behavior in a shuttle-box test with different emotional and motivational profiles (for reviews see 19,[48][49][50][51] 11 a common feature of the lack of executive control over actions is present in both impulsivity and compulsivity. 56 Thus, we can deduce that the frequency of licking in SIP predicts deficits in inhibitory control, and when accompanied by a high intensity of licking, reveals compulsivity and possible tendencies for engaging in excessive habitual behavior.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Strain-dependent Sip and Phenotype Differencmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 In addition, the selective breeding of Roman high-avoidance (RHA) and Roman low-avoidance (RLA) rats for rapid vs poor acquisition of active avoidance behavior in the shuttle box test resulted in 2 phenotypes that present with differences in SIP acquisition. Other strains, such as the spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) that are characterized as hyperactive and impulsive in terms of their exacerbated sensitivity to delayed reinforcement, display increased SIP drinking when compared with Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) control rats, 11,21 as well as 2 rat lines selectively bred for high-ethanol preference compared with their control counterparts. Other strains, such as the spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) that are characterized as hyperactive and impulsive in terms of their exacerbated sensitivity to delayed reinforcement, display increased SIP drinking when compared with Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) control rats, 11,21 as well as 2 rat lines selectively bred for high-ethanol preference compared with their control counterparts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%