Different options for metal recovery after sludge decontamination at the Montreal Urban Community wastewater treatment plant

Abstract

The MUG (Montreal Urban Community) treatment plant produces approximately 270 tons of dry sludge daily (270 tds/day) during the physico-chemical treatment of wastewater. Recently, this treatment plant endowed a system of drying and granulation of sludge for valorization as an agricultural fertilizer having a capacity of 70 tds/day (25% of the daily sludge production). However, the metal content (mainly Cu and Cd) of the sludge surpasses the norms for biosolids valorization. In order to solve this problem, a demonstration project, from the lab scale to the industrial pilot plant, was carried out to test the Metix-AC technology for the removal of metals. A strongly metal-loaded filtrate was generated during the sludge decontamination. Tests concerned the study of the metal recovery by total precipitation and selective precipitation, as well as the use of alternative products for the metal precipitation. Other works consisted to simulate the acid filtrate recirculation from the decontaminated sludge (25% of the total volume) in the untreated sludge (75% of the total volume) intended for the incineration. The total precipitation with hydrated limeappearedeffectivefortherecoveryof metals (87% Cd, 96% Cr, 97% Cu, 98% Fe, 71% Ni, 100% Pb, 98% Zn). However, this option entails the production of an important quantity of metallic residue, which should be disposed of expensively as dangerous material. The selective iron precipitation does not appear to bean interesting option because the iron in solution within the leached sludge was principally present in the form of ferrous iron, which cannot be precipitated at pH lower than five. On the other hand, the use of commercial precipitating agents (TMT-15, CP-33Z, CP-NB and CPX) without pH adjustment of filtrate gave good results for the recovery of Cu and, to a lesser degree for the recovery of Pb. However, the efficiency for the other metals' (Cd, Cr, Fe, Ni and Zn) recovery was weaker (< 25%). Finally, the acid filtrate recirculation containing solubilised metals in untreated sludge destined for incineration appears to be the most interesting option. Metals in solution in the acid filtrate, precipitate or adsorb effectively (97% Cd, 97% Cr, 99% Cu, 82% Ni, 100% Pb and 87% Zn) on the solids of the untreated sludge. Moreover, TCLP tests were done on ashes produced during the incineration of sludge mixed with the acid filtrate produced during sludge decontamination. These tests showed that there were no significant differences, as regards the extractability of metals, between such ashes and those produced during the untreated sludge incineration without addition of filtrate. Therefore, it was predictable that this method can respect the current environmental standards required by the different governmental authorities.

Bioleaching of heavy metals from sewage sludge: A review

“…However, these reagents were found to be effective in the recovery of Cu only (70-97%) and not other metals (Meunier et al, 2002a). Several natural adsorbents such as cocoa shell and cedar bark have been used successfully for recovery of metals from acidic leachate (Meunier et al, 2002b).…”

Application of a CCA-treated wood waste decontamination process to other copper-based preservative-treated wood after disposal

“…Various technologies have been developed for the removal of metals from groundwater, surface water and industrial effluents. However, the wide use of precipitation technology for wastewater treatment is explained by its high efficiency and low cost [13][14][15]. Metals can be removed by precipitation as metal oxides/hydroxides, sulfides, carbonates and phosphates [16].…”

Metals removal from soil, fly ash and sewage sludge leachates by precipitation and dewatering properties of the generated sludge

“…Metal separation from solutions by formation of metal hydroxides is the most common precipitation method due to the relative low costs of hydroxide salts [17][18][19]. Soluble metals can be precipitated as hydroxides by using different alkaline reagents, like CaO, Ca(OH) 2 , Mg(OH) 2 , NaOH and NH 4 OH [12,13,20].…”