2006
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different levels of alternative splicing among eukaryotes

Abstract: Alternative splicing increases transcriptome and proteome diversification. Previous analyses aiming at comparing the rate of alternative splicing between different organisms provided contradicting results. These contradicting results were attributed to the fact that both analyses were dependent on the expressed sequence tag (EST) coverage, which varies greatly between the tested organisms. In this study we compare the level of alternative splicing among eight different organisms. By employing an EST independen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
391
1
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 462 publications
(429 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
22
391
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This fundamental difference is based on different natures of splicing: the splicing of Dscam generates mutually exclusive, but inter-replaceable regions that are essential parts of the structure, whereas the splicing of neuroligins and neurexins generates inserts or deletions that are not essential to structural integrity. It was estimated that 60% of the human genes have two or more splicing variants 33 , in which the insertion/deletion-type splicing represented by neuroligins and neurexins is predominant 33 . Since the minimal transcript is functional in most splicing cases, most of the extra inserts/deletions should be not essential to the structural integrity of and should extend from the core scaffold, as observed in neuroligins and neurexins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fundamental difference is based on different natures of splicing: the splicing of Dscam generates mutually exclusive, but inter-replaceable regions that are essential parts of the structure, whereas the splicing of neuroligins and neurexins generates inserts or deletions that are not essential to structural integrity. It was estimated that 60% of the human genes have two or more splicing variants 33 , in which the insertion/deletion-type splicing represented by neuroligins and neurexins is predominant 33 . Since the minimal transcript is functional in most splicing cases, most of the extra inserts/deletions should be not essential to the structural integrity of and should extend from the core scaffold, as observed in neuroligins and neurexins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has recently been established that AS is a further frequent, important regulatory mechanism of gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans, human, mouse, and Drosophila, and analyses of the developmental stage-and/or tissue-specific expression patterns of AS variants are likely to become important components of biological research (Lareau et al, 2004;Pajares et al, 2007). In humans, it is estimated that about 60% of genes undergo AS (Modrek and Lee, 2002), exon skipping being the most common form and intron retention (IntronR) the least common (Kim et al, 2007). Most of the AS genes in humans are involved in signaling and regulation (Valdivia, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst exon skipping is widespread in metazoan systems (Kim et al 2007), this appears relatively rare in Arabidopsis (<5%).…”
Section: Resolution Expression Map Of As Events In Arabidopsis Root Tmentioning
confidence: 99%