2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2gc35318k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different ionic liquids favor different lignocellulosic biomass particle sizes during pretreatment to function efficiently

Abstract: Cotton stalks at four different particles sizes (<0.15 mm, 0.15-0.5 mm, 0.5-1.0 mm and 1.0-2.0 mm) were subjected to ionic liquid pretreatment via 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate (EMIMAc) and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (EMIMCl) followed by the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomass. The changes in crystalline structure, lignin content and digestibility of the pretreated samples were investigated in addition to the glucose yield obtained from cotton stalks. For EMIMAc pretreatment, the lowest … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies report reduced lignin and hemicellulose content in pretreated biomass, while the glucan fraction, which is mainly cellulose, is usually almost completely recovered. The effect of pH value (Zhang et al 2013), particle sizes (Bahcegul et al 2012;Hou et al 2013), water content, pretreatment time, and other influencing factors (Brandt et al 2011) have been investigated in grasses, hardwood, and softwood. The impact of ILs treatment on the composition of treated biomass was investigated in several studies (Fu et al 2010(Fu et al , 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies report reduced lignin and hemicellulose content in pretreated biomass, while the glucan fraction, which is mainly cellulose, is usually almost completely recovered. The effect of pH value (Zhang et al 2013), particle sizes (Bahcegul et al 2012;Hou et al 2013), water content, pretreatment time, and other influencing factors (Brandt et al 2011) have been investigated in grasses, hardwood, and softwood. The impact of ILs treatment on the composition of treated biomass was investigated in several studies (Fu et al 2010(Fu et al , 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be due to extensive depolymerization reactions leading to soluble oligosaccharides. The trend was opposite for [Emim][Cl] solution, where the highest yield was achieved for larger size particles (Bahcegul et al 2012). The transformation from cellulose I to cellulose II was only observed by using [Emim][CH 3 COO] for the smallest particle size studied (< 0.15 mm).…”
Section: Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 87%
“…The glucose recovery percentage was increased almost linearly from 26.2% to 96.7% with the increase of temperature. Another study showed that [Emim][CH 3 COO] was capable of disrupting the lignocellulosic materials in a shorter period of time, resulting in a higher yield of monosaccharaides (Bahcegul et al 2012). The degree of crystallization (DP) of cellulose-rich materials after regeneration was also found to decrease with the increasing pre-treatment time (Sant'Ana Da Silva et al 2011).…”
Section: Timementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adding water or other organic solvent to IL systems can reduce the process cost significantly if pretreatment effectiveness is not compromised. The ILs mixtures have been successful applied in enzymatic hydrolysis [5]- [7]. ILs-water mixtures proved to be highly effective for biomass pretreatment by selective removal of lignin and it was obtained objective results for bio-fuel [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%