2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(02)00685-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different genomic evolutionary rates in the various reptile lineages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
25
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also interesting to point out that we found a small difference in GC level at both the global sequence and at the stem level between polar and tropical/temperate fishes, and that this difference is accompanied by differences in the DNA methylation level (Varriale and Bernardi 2006a). Reptiles seem to be in an intermediate position, in agreement with previous results on their genomes that concerned nucleotide composition, band asymmetry in cesium chloride, compositional heterogeneity (for review, see Bernardi 2005), karyotypic evolutionary rates (Olmo et al 2002;Olmo 2005), and DNA methylation (Varriale and Bernardi 2006b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is also interesting to point out that we found a small difference in GC level at both the global sequence and at the stem level between polar and tropical/temperate fishes, and that this difference is accompanied by differences in the DNA methylation level (Varriale and Bernardi 2006a). Reptiles seem to be in an intermediate position, in agreement with previous results on their genomes that concerned nucleotide composition, band asymmetry in cesium chloride, compositional heterogeneity (for review, see Bernardi 2005), karyotypic evolutionary rates (Olmo et al 2002;Olmo 2005), and DNA methylation (Varriale and Bernardi 2006b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Such differences between turtles, crocodiles and squamates may stem from a greater tendency of turtles to preserve and accumulate repetitive DNAs (Olmo, 1984;Olmo et al, 2002), this is consistent with the report by FitzSimmons et al (1995), who found homologous microsatellite loci in non-related marine and freshwater turtles indicating the conservation of flanking sequences spanning approximately 300 million years of divergent evolution. Vice versa, deletions limiting the accumulation of functionally dispensable DNAs would be more frequent in squamates (Olmo et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In particular chelonians, and to some extent crocodiles, show a large and more variable genome size, with quantitative differences also in single-copy DNA (probably in a non-coding fraction), and in repetitive DNA fractions with heterogeneous composition (middle repetitive DNA), whose variations bear no relationship with phylogenesis. By contrast, lizards and snakes show small and more consistent genome sizes, where single-copy DNA is constant and differences mainly depend on the amount of highly repetitive DNA (satellite DNA) (Olmo et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…La hipótesis del origen de los microcromosomas "B" presentes en la biodiversidad mexicana, puede tener relación con la presencia de componentes xenobióticos en niveles o concentraciones elevadas (Arias-Rodriguez et al, 2007;2008;Hernández-Guzmán et al, 2011); esta idea es reforzada por los antecedentes históricos de presencia de metales pesados en sistemas acuáticos y terrestres del Golfo de México y principalmente del estado de Tabasco, de donde son procedentes las tres especies de tortugas K. leucostomum, T. scripta y S. triporcatus (Rosas et al, 1983;Villanueva & Botello, 1992;Fiedler et al, 2009;De la Cruz-Pons et al, 2012). También algunos estudios han demostrado la relevancia de los microcromosomas, por ejemplo en la tortuga Pelodiscus sinensis en la que el 50% de los genes funcionales se encuentran alojados en los microcromosomas (Kuraku et al, 2006), los cuales son ricos en secuencias de Guanina-Citosina más que en los macrocromosomas, a pesar de que los microcromosomas sólo representan el 23% del total de ADN (Olmo, Capriglione & Odierna, 2002;Olmo, 2008). La suma total de las longitudes del complemento cromosómico en K. leucostomum en mitosis (239.53±16.5µm) y en meiosis (111.99±17.8µm) está correlacionado con el contenido total de ADN diploide de 2.8 pico gramos (pg) y de 2C=2.6 pg reportados para la tortuga K. subrubrum por Olmo (1976) y De Smet (1981), respectivamente.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified