1952
DOI: 10.1080/00332747.1952.11022892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different Cultural Concepts of Past, Present, and Future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an approach which may also be characterized as field-theoretical, Lewin (1946Lewin ( , 1951 was concerned with time perspective as a dimension of the "life space" and refers briefly to a formulation which might account for its development. In another reference to this topic, Lewin (1942) suggests that the social environment in which an individual lives may materially influence his time perspective-a view also discussed by Smith (1952). If a person lives in a social environment which is autocratic, for example, the future is decided and structured by the leader.…”
Section: The Concept Of Time Perspective Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an approach which may also be characterized as field-theoretical, Lewin (1946Lewin ( , 1951 was concerned with time perspective as a dimension of the "life space" and refers briefly to a formulation which might account for its development. In another reference to this topic, Lewin (1942) suggests that the social environment in which an individual lives may materially influence his time perspective-a view also discussed by Smith (1952). If a person lives in a social environment which is autocratic, for example, the future is decided and structured by the leader.…”
Section: The Concept Of Time Perspective Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, envisionality may extend to both the past and the future. For example, the Hindu and Chinese cultures have representations that extend far backward to the past and forward to the future (Smith 1952).…”
Section: Cognitive-motivational Model Of Time Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of time orientation as a dimension which contributes significantly to the understanding of the individual (both alone and as a member of a group) has long been proposed by scientists with diverse interests in the field of human behavior (Balken, 1943;Lewin, 1942Lewin, , 1946Oberndorf, 1941;Sturt, 192S). Anthropologists and sociologists have shown that cultures, at various phases in their existence, as well as various social classes within one culture, tend to entertain temporal orientations unique to themselves, which serve to shape, organize, and control communal activities (Arieti, 1947;Ketchum, 1951;Smith, 1952;Werner, 1948). Russell takes the view that civilizations mature in a manner parallel to individuals, by gradually abandoning activities which are oriented toward short-term impulse gratification and taking up instead functions which demand foresight, delay, and synchronization of group activities, that is, a future-oriented time sense (Arieti, 1947).…”
Section: New York Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%