2000
DOI: 10.1300/j046v13n01_05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Orientation in the United States, China, and Mexico

Abstract: The study details the psychometric properties of a time orientation scale initially developed in the United States and examines this scale not only in the United States but in two trading partners with maximally different time orientations, China and Mexico. The scale is compared across the three countries by examining the number of factors that emerge, the types of items that load on each factor, and the relationship between the factors and innovativeness and delay of gratification. The results indicate that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In traditional societies, the past and present are more important than the future, and this effect is more salient in cultures with an agricultural or nomadic-based economy (McInerney et al, 1997). For example, studies have shown that North Americans have a strong future orientation (Spears et al, 2001), whereas the Chinese are predominantly past-oriented (Brislin and Kim, 2003). However, such comparisons shed light on preferences for time orientations (e.g., past vs. future) within a single culture, but provide less information about how preferences differ between two or more cultures (Gao, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In traditional societies, the past and present are more important than the future, and this effect is more salient in cultures with an agricultural or nomadic-based economy (McInerney et al, 1997). For example, studies have shown that North Americans have a strong future orientation (Spears et al, 2001), whereas the Chinese are predominantly past-oriented (Brislin and Kim, 2003). However, such comparisons shed light on preferences for time orientations (e.g., past vs. future) within a single culture, but provide less information about how preferences differ between two or more cultures (Gao, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture shapes the way people process time information. Compared to Western cultures, Chinese culture is believed to be primarily past oriented (Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck, 1961; Spears et al., 2000; Brislin and Kim, 2003; Ji et al., 2009; Guo et al., 2012). Compared to Westerners, Chinese considered information pertaining to the past as being more relevant to solving present problems (Ji et al., 2009), emphasized more on traditions and being historical in TV commercials (Cheng and Schweitzer, 1996), and valued past events relatively more than future ones (Guo et al., 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case study approach (Yin, 2003) is more appropriate. We follow the examples of Spears et al (2001), Cunningham et al (2006) and Blankson et al (2007) in adopting the student cohort as the empirical context for this study. Whilst others have argued that students cannot be considered as cohorts, Thwaites and Vere (1995) have pointed out the special features and importance of the undergraduate market in the eyes of bankers because of their potential.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%