2017
DOI: 10.1111/imig.12373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different Contexts and Trends: Latina Immigrant Fertility in the US and Spain

Abstract: This article provides the first cross‐national assessment of Latina immigrant fertility trends. Specifically, we compare Ecuadorian women in Spain (EiS) to Mexican women in the United States (MiUS). We focus on these two groups because they (1) have similar socio‐economic profiles and (2) are the largest Latina subgroups in their respective host countries. We show that since 2001, the fertility rate of EiS has declined substantially more than the fertility rate of MiUS has. Drawing on census and administrative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Examples include Haug et al (2002) and Sobotka (2008) for European overviews; Abbasi- Shavazi and McDonald (2000) and Carmichael et al (2003) for Australia; Zeman et al (2015) for Austria; Sobotka (2011) for Austria, Germany and Switzerland; Bélanger et al (2002), Woldemicael and Beaujot (2012) and Adserà and Ferrer (2010 for Canada; Puur et al (2017) for Russians in Estonia, Toulemon (2004) and Héran et al (2007) Kulu and Hannemann (2016), Robards and Berrington (2016) and Wilson and Kuha (2017) for UK; Blau and Francine (1992), Kahn (1994), Carter (2000), Lindstrom and Saucedo (2002), Frank and Heuveline (2005), Blau et al (2008), Parrado (2011), Lichter et al (2012), Livingston et al (2012), Choi (2014) and National Academies of Sciences (2015) for the USA; and Mora et al (2017) for Latinas in USA and Spain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1 Examples include Haug et al (2002) and Sobotka (2008) for European overviews; Abbasi- Shavazi and McDonald (2000) and Carmichael et al (2003) for Australia; Zeman et al (2015) for Austria; Sobotka (2011) for Austria, Germany and Switzerland; Bélanger et al (2002), Woldemicael and Beaujot (2012) and Adserà and Ferrer (2010 for Canada; Puur et al (2017) for Russians in Estonia, Toulemon (2004) and Héran et al (2007) Kulu and Hannemann (2016), Robards and Berrington (2016) and Wilson and Kuha (2017) for UK; Blau and Francine (1992), Kahn (1994), Carter (2000), Lindstrom and Saucedo (2002), Frank and Heuveline (2005), Blau et al (2008), Parrado (2011), Lichter et al (2012), Livingston et al (2012), Choi (2014) and National Academies of Sciences (2015) for the USA; and Mora et al (2017) for Latinas in USA and Spain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…En España, aunque las inmigrantes magrebíes sí que tienen una ampliamente mayor fecundidad que las españolas, las latinoamericanas solo muestran una ligera mayor fecundidad (Castro Martín y Rosero-Bixby, 2011;Roig Vila y Castro Martín, 2007). Esta reducida diferencia se ha tratado de explicar aludiendo a factores clave como la existencia de una motivación laboral en la mayoría de inmigrantes latinoamericanas (Del Rey Poveda et al, 2015;González-Ferrer, 2011;González Ferrer y Cebolla Boado, 2018; Grande y García González, 2019) y al hecho de que en la mayoría de los casos exista una cercanía cultural en términos de idioma y religión, lo que facilitaría la convergencia hacia el comportamiento de las nativas (Adsera y Ferrer, 2014;Connor y Massey, 2010;Cristina Mora et al, 2018;González Ferrer y Cebolla Boado, 2018;Kraus y Castro-Martín, 2018). Por otro lado, las inmigrantes latinoamericanas sí que mantienen ciertos comportamientos relacionados con la maternidad propios de sus países de origen, como sería la elevada prevalencia de uniones consensuales (Cortina Trilla et al, 2010).…”
Section: La Fecundidad De Las Inmigrantes Y De Sus Descendientesunclassified