Advances in Network Clustering and Blockmodeling 2019
DOI: 10.1002/9781119483298.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different Approaches to Community Detection

Abstract: A precise definition of what constitutes a community in networks has remained elusive. Consequently, network scientists have compared community detection algorithms on benchmark networks with a particular form of community structure and classified them based on the mathematical techniques they employ. However, this comparison can be misleading because apparent similarities in their mathematical machinery can disguise different reasons for why we would want to employ community detection in the first place. Here… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, several researches have addressed community detection in heterogeneous multirelational networks. We can divide the related work into five categories based on the techniques used on the multidimensional community detection process, which are modularity optimization, 27 tensor factorization, 28 matrix factorization, 29 stochastic models based approach, 30 and label propagation based approach 31 …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several researches have addressed community detection in heterogeneous multirelational networks. We can divide the related work into five categories based on the techniques used on the multidimensional community detection process, which are modularity optimization, 27 tensor factorization, 28 matrix factorization, 29 stochastic models based approach, 30 and label propagation based approach 31 …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More modern methods based on embedding communities in low-dimensional vector spaces try to solve problems such as node clustering, node classification, low-dimensional visualizations, edges prediction, among others with great success [33,34]. However, we shall point out that this is a very active area of research with many facets, and as argued in [35], community detection should not be considered as a well-defined problem, but instead, should be motivated by particular reasons. In this sense, our motivation for detecting communities is to find groups of people with a clear topic of interest, regardless of whether such groups of people follow each other on Twitter.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is no single 'true' network partition (Peel et al, 2017). Instead, the method one applies should match the question one aims to answer (Ghasemian et al, 2019;Rosvall et al, 2018). For example, community detection using the group model (Allesina and Pascual, 2009) can provide insights into the roles species play in the network with groups of species that feed on, or are fed by, similar species -insights that cannot be obtained by identifying flow modules or maximising internal density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%