Differencial efficiency of two sampling methods in capturing non-volant small mammals in an area in eastern Amazonia

Abstract

This study was the first to evaluate the efficiency of trapping methods in the study of small mammals in the Carajás National Forest, southeastern Brazilian Amazon. It is an area with a unique vegetation type (metalofilic savannah or Canga). The aims of this study were to compare the efficiency of two trapping methods (i.e. live-traps and pitfalls), the bait types used, and evaluate if trapping success varied seasonally. We used four sampling grids, each with six parallel transects. The trap effort for live-traps and pitfalls was 51,840 trap*nights and 10,800 bucket*nights, respectively. We used three types of bait: a paste of peanut butter and sardines, bacon, and bananas. We placed one type of bait in each trap, alternating between points. We recorded 26 species of small mammals, 11 from the order Didelphimorphia and 15 from the order Rodentia. Pitfalls captured a higher number of species compared with live-traps. The capture rate, the mortality rate and the quantity of juveniles and adults did not differ significantly between methods. Capture rate for pitfalls differed significantly between seasons. The majority of species were captured by a single method. Species were equally attracted to the traps regardless of the type of bait used. Some of our results differed significantly from other studies in Amazonia and such variation should be taken into account when designing survey methods for Amazonian small mammals. KEYWORDS: Live-traps; pitfall-traps; Didelphimorphia; Rodentia; capture rate Diferenças na eficiência entre dois métodos de amostragem para capturar pequenos mamíferos não-voadores em uma área na Amazônia oriental RESUMO Este estudo foi o primeiro a avaliar a eficiência de métodos de captura de pequenos mamíferos não-voadores na Floresta Nacional de Carajás, sudeste da Amazônia brasileira. É uma área que apresenta características fitofisionômicas exclusivas (savana metalófila ou Canga) e sofre pressão da atividade mineradora. Os objetivos desse estudo foram comparar a eficiência de dois métodos de captura e de três tipos de iscas, bem como se a eficiência dos métodos variou sazonalmente. Nós usamos quatro grades de amostragem, cada uma com seis trilhas paralelas. Capturas com armadilhas de gaiola (live-traps) e armadilhas de caída (pitfall traps) foram realizadas durante três estações secas e três úmidas. O esforço total de captura foi de 51.840 armadilhas*noite e 10.800 baldes*noite para live-traps e pitfalls, respectivamente. Três tipos de isca (pasta de amendoim com sardinha, bacon e banana) foram usadas de forma alternada em todas as armadilhas. Nós registramos 26 espécies de pequenos mamíferos, 11 da ordem Didelphimorphia e 15 da ordem Rodentia. Pitfalls capturaram mais espécies que live-traps. As taxas de captura e de mortalidade e a proporção de jovens e adultos não diferiram entre os métodos. O sucesso de captura diferiu sazonalmente apenas para pitfalls. A maioria das espécies foi capturada preferencialmente ou exclusivamente por um dos dois métodos. As espécies foram igualmente atra...

Habitat Heterogeneity and Geographic Location as Major Drivers of Cerrado Small Mammal Diversity Across Multiple Spatial Scales

“…In fact, PTs provided a higher number of individuals and species not only for didelphids but also for some small cricetids (e.g., Microakodontomys, Oligoryzomys, and Calomys) in comparison with LTs, including species exclusively recorded using this method (M. kunsi, three Cryptonanus species, Pseudoryzomys simplex, and Cavia aperea; see also Cáceres et al, 2011b;Ribeiro-Júnior et al, 2011). These results evidence that sampling methodology can also compromise the diversity patterns uncovered for small mammals as a substantial portion of individuals, and species, are exclusively caught by either live or PTs (e.g., Umetsu et al, 2006;Ardente et al, 2017;Bovendorp et al, 2017).…”

Environmental DNA metabarcoding as a useful tool for evaluating terrestrial mammal diversity in tropical forests

“…Our results confirm that a combination of methods is required to detect a large proportion of the entire mammal community in Neotropical rainforests. For small mammals multiple trap types and placement options give the best results (Voss and Emmons 1996, Hice and Velazco 2012, dos Santos et al 2015, Lim and Pacheco 2016, Ardente et al 2017) and several studies showed that the addition of pitfall traps led to greatly increased estimates of species richness and abundance of Neotropical small mammals (Hice and Velazco 2013, Bovendorp et al 2017). Pitfall traps typically capture species thought to be rare or within different subsets of the small mammal community, especially terrestrial marsupials of the genus Monodelphis and semiaquatic rodents like the genus Neusticomys (Umetsu et al 2006, Hice and Velazco 2012, dos Santos et al 2015, Palmeirim et al 2019).…”

Species diversity, abundance, and movement of small mammals in the dry evergreen forest at Khao Yai National Park, Thailand

“…A total of 64 Tomahawk live traps (5.5×6.5×16 cm) were systematically placed in an 8×8 grid at 20 m intervals, and ripe bananas and palm oil as bait were used (Ardente et al 2017;Francis 2019). Trap cages were opened for 3 consecutive months per season, or 1 session, in each study period covering a total study period of 1 year, amounting to 32,555 trap-nights in total.…”