Differences of the brain activity in individual, competitive and cooperative behavior between subjects with analytic and holistic cognitive styles

Apanovich, Vladimir; Bezdenezhnykh, B.N.; Znakov, Viktor V.; Sams, Mikko; Jääskeläinen, Jaakko; Aleksandrov, Yu. I.

doi:10.17759/exppsy.2016090202

Cited by 9 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 17 publications

(2 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We have demonstrated that the systemic organization of behavior associated with competitive and cooperative forms of social interaction is different for subjects with analytical and holistic thinking. It turned out, that the holistic subjects expressed greater sensitivity to different forms of social interaction [45,46]. It is revealed that for subjects with analytical thinking the process of actualization of systems within the subject of behavior state goes CC BY 4.0 ПСИХОФИЗИОЛОГИЯ on faster in competitive forms of interaction, and for subjects with holistic thinking -in cooperative ones.…”

Section: Holistic and Analytic Nature Of Thinking As A Culturally Spementioning

confidence: 99%

The subject of behavior and dynamics of its states

Alexandrov

2018

РПЖ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. The concept of a “subject of behavior” (SB) was formulated within the system-evolutionary theory in systemic psychophysiology. It is argued that the development of the concept of SB requires describing other components of this internally consistent theory. Theoretical review. This section reviews the theoretical and empirical grounds used by V.B. Shvyrkov to formulate the original foundations of the concepts of SB and “state of the subject of behavior” (SSB). SB is defined as the whole set of functional systems (elements of subjective experience) comprising memory. SSB is defined as a section of functional systems (part of the whole set) that are formed at different stages of individual development and simultaneously actualized in order to provide the deployment of a certain step of the behavioral continuum. Behavior is considered as the dynamics of SSBs, i.e. the transition from the state corresponding to one behavioral act of the continuum to the state corresponding to the next behavioral act. Results. This section reviews the results of theoretical and empirical development of the concepts of SB and SSB that was aimed to expand their factually supported meaning. This development has been implemented via the research paradigm of system psychophysiology representing a field of multidisciplinary studies focused on the mechanisms of formation and actualisation of experience in human and other animals during individual and collective behavior. I review neurogenetic bases of experience formation; dynamics of the formation of the structure of experience within a strategic game; variability of SSBs during consequent behaviors; the role of learning history during formation of the structure of experience; specific characteristics of various domains of experience; the unified theory of consciousness and emotion along with its implications; dynamics of SSBs underlying regression; properties of various forms of social interaction in individuals with holistic and analytical mentalities; the system mechanisms of moral judgement of actions; and results of mathematical modelling of SB formation. Conclusions. Results of the reviewed studies of SB and SSB demonstrate heuristic value of these concepts and their potential as methodological tools for coordinated development in various fields of psychology and neuroscience.

show abstract

Section: Holistic and Analytic Nature Of Thinking As A Culturally Spementioning

confidence: 99%

The subject of behavior and dynamics of its states

Alexandrov

2018

РПЖ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to capture brain activity simultaneously from two subjects in different laboratories with synchronized setups. Since then, advancements in intricate instrumental recording methods and data processing algorithms have led to a growing number of studies analyzing interrelationships in brain region activity and somatovegetative indicators in people during collaborative activities [11,12].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Application of the “Banchenko's Mnemonic Dream Synchronization Method” for the Joint Synchronization of Dream Elements (Including Lucid Dreams), within the Framework of “Blokhin's Dreaming Cell Concept,” and the Analysis of the Obtained Results Using the “Kapustin's AI Dream Matching Model.”

2024

Int Internal MedJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The research is aimed at studying the potential for dream synchronization, including lucid dreams, among a group of participants using the concepts of "memes" and "tag-memes" within the framework of the "Banchenko Algorithm" and the "Mnemonic Dream Synchronization Technique of Banchenko." Additionally, it aims to assess the effectiveness of a new artificial intelligence model built and trained by Mykhailo Kapustin for identifying correlations in the dreams of the participants [1]. Methods: In the study, eight participants from different countries kept dream journals for a month. Afterward, the artificial intelligence model developed by Kapustin was trained to analyze these dreams. Following this, over the course of 16 days, synchronization among the group of participants was conducted using the "Mnemonic Dream Synchronization Technique of Banchenko," which included activities like collectively watching the TV series "The OA. Synchronization took into account the difference in time zones. Additionally, synchronous discussions of the viewing were carried out on the Telegram messenger, along with additional discussions related to key concepts and "tag-memes." Data analysis covered 30 days before synchronization and 30 days after the start of synchronization, using Kapustin's model with subsequent manual verification [2].Results: The data obtained for two periods confirm the influence of synchronization during wakefulness on dreams and highlight the emergence of "memes" and "tag-memes" in dream content, as well as objects and scenes unrelated to the elements of discussion or collective viewings. In-depth discussions during wakefulness contribute to the development of unique "tag-memes" within the group. The novelty of the research is based on the fact that it's suggested that electromagnetic fields may serve as mediators in intercellular communication, facilitating the exchange of information between cells. The systematic keeping of dream journals may influence the content of dreams. The frequency of lucid dreams remained stable, which may indicate the limited effectiveness of isolated methods of joint tuning without additional methods for inducing lucid dreams. Conclusions: The research highlights the impact of wakeful-state synchronization on dream content. "Memes" and "tag-memes" play their roles, but systematic dream journaling is also important for improving dream recall. The frequency of lucid dreams suggests the need for further investigation into isolated practices. A computational model excels at identifying common dream objects, but human evaluation remains integral during algorithm refinement.

show abstract

“…The characterization of the collaborative dimension of the activities and the link with job performance was considered in the present study both from individual and collective standpoint but the subjects' psychological characteristics were not addressed. Recent studies undertaken within Professor Alexandrov's team (Apanovich et al, 2016) showed that performance in collaborative activity was sensitive to the holist or analytic character of subjects. Their conclusions suggested that not having taken into account this cognitive aspect might limit the generalization of the result of the present study.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance in Collaborative Activity: Contribution of Intersubjectivity Theory

Fauquet-Alekhine¹,

Lahlou²

2022

JPBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaboration at work is a key component for activities in complex socio-technical systems. Reviewing the scientific literature showed that collaborative work activity has been well characterized, showing that perspective-taking is a crucial feature, but no study quantifies what makes the performance of collaborative activity. Analyzing performance during work activity inevitably refers to Cognitive Task Analysis paradigm (CTA). Based on digital ethnography and Intersubjectivity Theory, the study was undertaken in a nuclear power plant where cooperative activities were analyzed using a CTA process tracing method: whilst performing their activity, workers wore a miniature camera at the eye-level to record their activity from the first-person perspective and were then involved in a reflexive analysis of the activity. Results led to introduce the concept of “coherent perspective-taking” and demonstrated that it was the main variable explaining collaborative performance for cooperative activities. The related theoretical process is discussed and organizational factors favoring coherent perspective-taking are identified.

show abstract

Differences of the brain activity in individual, competitive and cooperative behavior between subjects with analytic and holistic cognitive styles

Cited by 9 publications

References 17 publications

The subject of behavior and dynamics of its states

The subject of behavior and dynamics of its states

Performance in Collaborative Activity: Contribution of Intersubjectivity Theory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About