2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in soil enzyme activities, microbial community structure and short-term nitrogen mineralisation resulting from farm management history and organic matter amendments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
68
1
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
10
68
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that differences in POC, PON, and DOC80 may be primarily in the free particulate organic C (FPOC) and free particulate organic N d Mean soil quality indicator value ± standard deviation; values followed by different letters for either the three CRM or three N-rate treatments are significantly different at p < 0.05 (FPON) fractions, which is thought to be younger and more plant derived (Six et al 2002a), suggesting the larger POC and PON in the R treatment reflect greater decomposition of recent added crop residues, which occurs through and is catalyzed by soil microorganisms (Saha et al 2008;Stark et al 2008). In addition, the DOC80 includes a portion of MBC and simple organic compounds (Chen et al 2004), suggesting that some simple organic compounds were released from the returned crop residues during the experimental periods.…”
Section: Discussion Effects Of Crop Residue On Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This indicates that differences in POC, PON, and DOC80 may be primarily in the free particulate organic C (FPOC) and free particulate organic N d Mean soil quality indicator value ± standard deviation; values followed by different letters for either the three CRM or three N-rate treatments are significantly different at p < 0.05 (FPON) fractions, which is thought to be younger and more plant derived (Six et al 2002a), suggesting the larger POC and PON in the R treatment reflect greater decomposition of recent added crop residues, which occurs through and is catalyzed by soil microorganisms (Saha et al 2008;Stark et al 2008). In addition, the DOC80 includes a portion of MBC and simple organic compounds (Chen et al 2004), suggesting that some simple organic compounds were released from the returned crop residues during the experimental periods.…”
Section: Discussion Effects Of Crop Residue On Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally recognized that increased organic residue inputs, either from plants or animal manure, will increase MBC size and enzymatic activities (Buchanan and King 1992;Dick 1992;Stark et al 2008) because of increased availability of C substrate that stimulates microbial activity (Nayak et al 2007). In this study, the Rc treatment received extra C derived from organic manure by 58, 77, and 96 g m −2 year −1 for the F270, F360, and F450 treatments, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A adição de resíduos orgânicos ao solo proporciona aumento não linear na biomassa e na atividade microbiana (Stark et al, 2008), enquanto em solos sem adição de resíduos, há redução no teor de C microbiano (Conceição et al, 2005). O efeito do preparo do solo durante a reforma do canavial pode ter propiciado condições favoráveis ao desenvolvimento microbiano em razão do aumento da aeração e da incorporação de resíduos ao solo, minimizando o efeito do tempo após a última reforma e fazendo com que houvesse semelhança entre os teores de C microbiano nas áreas de um e de seis anos (Figura 4).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Additionally, the enzyme activities also correlate with the soil microbial biomass (Jiang et al, 2009). Forest cleaning, cropping and management affect the soil microbial diversity and activity (Degens et al, 2000, Stark et al, 2008. Decrease in microbial activity in intensively managed soil in comparison to well managed pastures has been observed (Riffaldi et al, 2002).…”
Section: Indicators Of Soil Health In Forestry Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%