2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-018-7411-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in precipitation and evapotranspiration between forested and deforested areas in the Amazon rainforest using remote sensing data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For given precipitation, ET increase would lead to an increase in evaporation ratio (i.e., ET / P ) and hence a reduction in water resources in a long‐term time scale. However, variations in ET and vegetation change will further change regional precipitation via land‐atmospheric interactions (de Oliveira et al, 2018; Li & Xue, 2005). It should be noted that the change in precipitation is larger than the change in ET over the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For given precipitation, ET increase would lead to an increase in evaporation ratio (i.e., ET / P ) and hence a reduction in water resources in a long‐term time scale. However, variations in ET and vegetation change will further change regional precipitation via land‐atmospheric interactions (de Oliveira et al, 2018; Li & Xue, 2005). It should be noted that the change in precipitation is larger than the change in ET over the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(), who found a similar pattern of ET (decrease from May to September) in a transitional forest in the Eastern Amazon, with average ET = 3.3 mm⋅day −1 . However, considering the percentage of forest and deforested area in the IRB, the ET in the wet season was lower than expected by the values presented by de Oliveira et al (), who used remote sensing, and by Hodnett et al (1996), who used a water balance approach. The ability of roots to access moisture in deep soil layers (Jipp et al ., ; Christoffersen et al ., ; Maeda et al ., ) and the use of increased light during the dry season (Baker et al ., ) explain the weak seasonality, even with 51% of the basin deforested, as the secondary vegetation has similar evapotranspiration to the forest (Jipp et al ., ), and the pasture's roots in the region are not so shallow (Nepstad et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Based on the land cover dynamics (MCD12Q2) for 2005, 2010, 2011, and 2013 (Figure S5 in Supporting Information ), the value of NBAR‐EVI2 in the southern Amazon basin is relatively large, corresponding to the area of WPDs changed. The WPD of ϕETTWSA1degree ${\phi }_{ET-TWSA}^{1-degree}$ has zero‐to‐positive variation patterns from 2002 to 2013 (Figure 5), suggesting that the decrease in ET after forest deforestation or degradation (Brown et al., 2016; De Oliverira et al., 2018; Staal et al., 2020) was first caused by a reduction of the capacity of the vegetation to access subsurface water (Aparecide et al., 2020; Zemp et al., 2017). Humphrey et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%