2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.12.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Physical Performance Measures Among Patients With Unilateral Lower-Limb Amputations Classified as Functional Level K3 Versus K4

Abstract: Clinicians involved in prosthetic prescription may consider including the TUG, 10MWT, AMPPRO, and 6MWT during their clinical evaluations to help differentiate between individuals of higher functional mobility. The LCI and PEQ-MS may be less useful in classifying individuals as K3 versus K4 because of a ceiling effect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with a recent study that noted functional tests such as the 6MWT and AMPPro were able to distinguish between K3 and K4 groups but self-report measures, including the LCI-5, did not. 22 The Houghton, LCI-5, and ABC scales are known to be of lesser value for higher performing individuals because of significant ceiling effects. 1,8 In a conservative approach, floor or ceiling effects are present when 15% or more of a group’s scores are at either extreme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with a recent study that noted functional tests such as the 6MWT and AMPPro were able to distinguish between K3 and K4 groups but self-report measures, including the LCI-5, did not. 22 The Houghton, LCI-5, and ABC scales are known to be of lesser value for higher performing individuals because of significant ceiling effects. 1,8 In a conservative approach, floor or ceiling effects are present when 15% or more of a group’s scores are at either extreme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome metrics for assessment were chosen based on prosthetic literature as comprehensive assessments for performance-based clinical outcomes [21][22][23][24] as well as participant-reported outcomes [25].…”
Section: Outcome Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess walking speed, we performed the 10MWT, 15,17 which is a simple method of measuring walking speed in meters per second over a short duration. Subjects were instructed to walk a 10 m straight path distance at their preferred walking pace.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,13,14 The Falls Efficacy Scale (FES) and the 10-meter walk test (10MWT) are two instruments used to characterise the functionality of lower limb amputees. [15][16][17] FES measures fear of falls and 10MWT assesses walking speed over short distances. The level of functional performance is relevant to detect fall risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%