2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.04.429701
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors

Abstract: The metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) form a family of neuromodulatory G protein-coupled receptors that contain both a seven-helix transmembrane domain (TMD) and a large extracellular ligand-binding domain (LBD) which enables stable dimerization. While numerous studies have revealed variability across subtypes in the initial activation steps at the level of LBD dimers, an understanding of inter-TMD interaction and rearrangement remains limited. Here we use a combination of single molecule fluorescence,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defining the stoichiometry and subunit arrangement of KAR di-heteromers Having established the general structural compatibility (Figure 1) and extensive co-expression of KAR subunit types (Figure 2), we aimed to assess the assembly, stoichiometry, and subunit arrangement of KARs composed of different pairs of subunit types, starting with di-heteromers. We employed the SiMPull method in which detergent-solubilized and fluorophore-tagged receptors are immobilized via antibodies and their subunits counted by photobleaching step analysis (Jain et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2020;Levitz et al, 2016;Royal et al, 2019;Thibado et al, 2021). We first generated GluK1 and GluK2 constructs with an N-terminal hemagglutinin (HA) epitope followed by a SNAP tag (Figure S4B) amenable to labeling with organic dyes, and both maintained normal receptor function (Figure S4B; Table S2).…”
Section: Figure 1 Structural Similarity Between Kainate Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defining the stoichiometry and subunit arrangement of KAR di-heteromers Having established the general structural compatibility (Figure 1) and extensive co-expression of KAR subunit types (Figure 2), we aimed to assess the assembly, stoichiometry, and subunit arrangement of KARs composed of different pairs of subunit types, starting with di-heteromers. We employed the SiMPull method in which detergent-solubilized and fluorophore-tagged receptors are immobilized via antibodies and their subunits counted by photobleaching step analysis (Jain et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2020;Levitz et al, 2016;Royal et al, 2019;Thibado et al, 2021). We first generated GluK1 and GluK2 constructs with an N-terminal hemagglutinin (HA) epitope followed by a SNAP tag (Figure S4B) amenable to labeling with organic dyes, and both maintained normal receptor function (Figure S4B; Table S2).…”
Section: Figure 1 Structural Similarity Between Kainate Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assembly process of protomers into functional dimers remains poorly understood, but high-resolution mGluR structures and mutational analyses suggest that dimerization relies primarily on interactions between the hydrophobic interfaces of the VFT and interactions between the TMDs (El Moustaine et al, 2012;Koehl et al, 2019;Kunishima et al, 2000;Levitz et al, 2016). Interestingly, interactions between the TMDs play a predominant role in homodimerization of mGluR2 while for other mGluRs TMD interactions play only a moderate role in receptor dimerization (Gutzeit et al, 2019;Thibado et al, 2021). While mGluRs were long thought to be strict homodimeric receptors, a number of recent studies indicate that mGluRs are also able to form various heterodimer combinations (Doumazane et al, 2011;Habrian et al, 2019;Kammermeier, 2012;Levitz et al, 2016;Moreno Delgado et al, 2017;Pandya et al, 2016;Werthmann et al, 2020;Yin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Receptor Dimerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%