1986
DOI: 10.1016/0147-9571(86)90080-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in IgG1 and IgG2 responses of cattle infected with Coxiella burnetii and following vaccination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An important consideration is which phase of C. burnetii to use. Whilst experiments in laboratory animals have demonstrated the superiority of phase I vaccines in affording protection against challenge (18), large scale commercial production of antigen is easier and safer using organisms in phase II (23). The particular strain of the organism would appear to be of little consequence given the proven ability of individual strains to induce complete reciprocal cross protection, at least in guinea pigs (18).…”
Section: Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important consideration is which phase of C. burnetii to use. Whilst experiments in laboratory animals have demonstrated the superiority of phase I vaccines in affording protection against challenge (18), large scale commercial production of antigen is easier and safer using organisms in phase II (23). The particular strain of the organism would appear to be of little consequence given the proven ability of individual strains to induce complete reciprocal cross protection, at least in guinea pigs (18).…”
Section: Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the more sensitive and versatile tests now available the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is particularly valuable for routine serum analysis and for isotype analysis of the antibody response. Recently, considerable advances have been made in the development and application of an ELISA for detection and sub-isotypic discrimination of antibodies to C. burnetii (23,24). Notwithstanding criticisms of possible allotypic bias in this type of test (11) it has the particular pragmatic advantage that, in cattle, it can differentiate between the essentially IgG~ response to infection and the predominantly IgG: response to vaccination.…”
Section: Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From previous vaccination experiments, a pool of serum samples from 10 vaccinated cattle was used which had preinoculation titers derived from natural C. burnetii infection prior to vaccination with a Formalin-inactivated whole-cell antigen of C. burnetii (22). Fifty-two serum samples from nonvaccinated cattle with naturally occurring C. burnetii infections (different breeds, ages, and sexes originating from the Federal Republic of Germany and the United States) were randomly selected from a serum bank available from previous investigations (18,20,22,23).…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous investigations with IgG1-and IgG2-specific ELISA, using a whole-cell antigen, demonstrated that cattle vaccinated with a commercially available, Formalin-inactivated Q fever vaccine predominantly synthesized C. burnetii-specific IgG2. In contrast, naturally infected cattle preferentially produced IgGl (18,20,22). Therefore, we investigated to what extent different antigens, such as SP27 and LPS, induce production of different IgG subclasses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirekte Immunperoxidase-Technik (IPOD) Die Durchfuhrung des Immunperoxidaseverfahrens zum Nachweis Coxiellen-spezifischer Antikorper erfolgte bis auf folgende Modifikationen wie kurzlich beschrieben (38) (35,36). Auch bei Coxiellen-infizierten Menschen, sowie Chlamydien-infizierten Tauben lieR sich nicht-komplementbindendes IgM (31,33,49) nur mit IgM-spezifischen oder mit allen Immunglobulinen reagierenden IgG(H+L)-spezifischen ELISAs bzw.…”
Section: Agargelprazipitationstest (Agpt)unclassified