2011
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.02444-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in HIV-Specific T Cell Responses between HIV-Exposed and -Unexposed HIV-Seronegative Individuals

Abstract: HIV-1-specific T lymphocyte responses in individuals exposed to HIV-1 but who remain persistently seronegative (HESNs) have been reported in some but not all previous studies. This study was designed to resolve unequivocally the question of whether HESNs make HIV-1-specific T cell responses. We performed a blind investigation to measure HIV-1-specific T cell responses in both HIV-1-serodiscordant couples and HIV-1-unexposed seronegative controls (HUSNs). We found low-frequency HIV-1-specific T cells in both HE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
32
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
6
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The response rates and frequencies of T cells specific for influenza virus, cytomegalovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus were higher than those specific for HIV and not significantly different between HESN and HUSN, suggesting that HUSN were not particularly sheltered from environmental exposure to common viruses, nor did they have had intrinsic T cell responsiveness defects. Within the limits of the cultured ELISPOT assay, the response rate to HIV subtypes A and D in HUSN parallels findings in studies with B subtype in the United Kingdom and C subtype in Malawi (21). In that study and in the present one, strict criteria for the definition of the HESN and HUSN groups and for the quality control of ELISPOT responses were used; thus, the baseline responses observed in HUSN are likely to represent cross-reactivity with other undefined environmental exposures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The response rates and frequencies of T cells specific for influenza virus, cytomegalovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus were higher than those specific for HIV and not significantly different between HESN and HUSN, suggesting that HUSN were not particularly sheltered from environmental exposure to common viruses, nor did they have had intrinsic T cell responsiveness defects. Within the limits of the cultured ELISPOT assay, the response rate to HIV subtypes A and D in HUSN parallels findings in studies with B subtype in the United Kingdom and C subtype in Malawi (21). In that study and in the present one, strict criteria for the definition of the HESN and HUSN groups and for the quality control of ELISPOT responses were used; thus, the baseline responses observed in HUSN are likely to represent cross-reactivity with other undefined environmental exposures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…In the present study, we wanted to answer the question of whether the induction of T cell-mediated immune responses to HIV occur in exposed uninfected individuals with a well-defined heterosexual exposure to HIV compared to a companion study (21) involving predominantly homosexual exposure. To this end, we enrolled Ugandan HIV serodiscordant couples who declared Ն25 episodes of unprotected heterosexual sexual intercourse in the previous year.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was limited by the fact that we performed only one type of immune assay on unfractionated PBMC, making it difficult to distinguish CD8 ϩ and CD4 ϩ responses. CD4 responses to peptides restricted to multiple HLA-DR types have recently been shown to contribute to ELISpot responses observed in HESN and low-risk controls (42). We had limited ability to confirm responses using frozen samples due to limited numbers of PBMC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, studies have demonstrated that the presence of HIV-specific CD4 T cells is enriched in individuals spontaneously able to control viral replication in the absence of antiretroviral therapy (8,16,21). Furthermore, the presence of HIV-specific CD4 T cells in highly exposed but HIV-seronegative individuals also suggests a protective role for this cellular subset (20). In addition, it is important to note that although a small percentage of HIV-specific CD4 T cells are preferentially targeted by HIV, the vast majority of these cells remain uninfected at all times in vivo (6), where they are likely to mediate an important antiviral role.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%