2013
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00721-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative and Qualitative Differences in the T Cell Response to HIV in Uninfected Ugandans Exposed or Unexposed to HIV-Infected Partners

Abstract: d HIV-exposed and yet persistently uninfected individuals have been an intriguing, repeated observation in multiple studies, but uncertainty persists on the significance and implications of this in devising protective strategies against HIV. We carried out a cross-sectional analysis of exposed uninfected partners in a Ugandan cohort of heterosexual serodiscordant couples (37.5% antiretroviral therapy naive) comparing their T cell responses to HIV peptides with those of unexposed uninfected individuals. We used… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previously described characteristic of HESN is the presence of systemic HIV-1-specific T-cell responses 3,7-9,26,27 . We compared frequency, magnitude and breadth of HIV-specific T-cell responses in cases and controls to determine whether they could protect against HIV-1 acquisition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A previously described characteristic of HESN is the presence of systemic HIV-1-specific T-cell responses 3,7-9,26,27 . We compared frequency, magnitude and breadth of HIV-specific T-cell responses in cases and controls to determine whether they could protect against HIV-1 acquisition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To determine the fate of some of these responses which were no longer detectable, we used the cultured IFN-γ ELISPOT assay which assesses the proliferation of low frequency T-cells [40, 41, 44]. Sample availability limited evaluation by the cultured ELISPOT assay to only 8 subjects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infection by CMV (47) or varicella zoster virus (48) has been shown to induce overexpression of CCNB1 in infected cells and may favor initiation of the T cell response. Alternatively, memory CCNB1-specific CD4 T cells could have been primed by crossreactivity with other Ags (49), as suggested by the detection of memory T cells specific to viruses in donors without any previous exposure (42,50,51). The CCNB1 sequence 199-237 is identical in orthologs found in farm animals (sheep, horse, pork) and pets (cat, dog, guinea pig), which could be a source of sensitization by contact or ingestion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%