2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00095-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: class and frequency effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
72
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
72
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This raises the question of whether the determiner-noun combination in (5a) independently elicits a negativity, in comparison to preposition-determiner-noun combinations. Some studies have reported that closed class words elicit different ERPs than open class words (Neville, Mills, & Lawson, 1992;Pulvermuller, Lutzenberger, & Birbaumer, 1995), although other studies have reported no differences across classes (Münte et al, 2001;Osterhout, Bersick, & McKinnon, 1997). Irrespectively, both articles and the prepositions in the current stimuli are closed class or functional categories, and we have no evidence that these lexical differences should yield independent ERP differences.…”
Section: Designcontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…This raises the question of whether the determiner-noun combination in (5a) independently elicits a negativity, in comparison to preposition-determiner-noun combinations. Some studies have reported that closed class words elicit different ERPs than open class words (Neville, Mills, & Lawson, 1992;Pulvermuller, Lutzenberger, & Birbaumer, 1995), although other studies have reported no differences across classes (Münte et al, 2001;Osterhout, Bersick, & McKinnon, 1997). Irrespectively, both articles and the prepositions in the current stimuli are closed class or functional categories, and we have no evidence that these lexical differences should yield independent ERP differences.…”
Section: Designcontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…This result is in line with the hypothesis that the P600 reflects in part a semantic-based process (Canseco-Gonzalez, 2000;Canseco-Gonzalez et al, 1997;Münte et al, 1997), but it was not predicted by the Timing Hypothesis (Hahne & Jescheniak, 2001). Since the negative grammaticality effects in this study were elicited early (< 300 ms), and since critical words in the present study were closed-class words, thus their occurrences should not be perceived as semantic errors (Münte et al, 2001;Neville et al, 1992;Nobre & McCarthy, 1994), the present data demonstrate that, contrary to the prediction of the Timing Hypothesis, the attenuation of P600 does not require error detection in both syntactic and semantic domains. Unlike the violations in the studies by Canseco-Gonzalez and her colleagues (Canseco-Gonzalez, 2000;Canseco-Gonzalez et al, 1997) and Münte and his colleagues (1997), the violations in the study by Hahne and Jescheniak (2001) were at the end of the sentence.…”
Section: Grammaticality Effectscontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…If this effect indexes processes based on semantics, as suggested in previous studies (Canseco-Gonzalez, 2000;Canseco-Gonzalez et al, 1997;Münte et al, 1997), the amplitude of the effect should be reduced when sentences lack semantic content. Since the syntactic violations employed in this study elicit an anterior negativity in an early latency range (< 300 ms) according to the pilot results, and since the critical words were all closed-class words, which would not elicit an N400 (Münte et al, 2001;Neville, Mills & Lawson, 1992;Nobre & McCarthy, 1994); such attenuation would provide evidence against the Timing Hypothesis proposed by Hahne and Jescheniak (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, this issue is discussed controversially. Results of other studies revealed that differences between word classes do not reflect qualitatively separate processing mechanisms, but rather are a function of word frequency or of frequency and length (e.g., King & Kutas, 1998;Münte, Wieringa, Weyerts, Szentkuti, Matzke, & Johannes, 2001;Osterhout, Bersick, & McKinnon, 1997).…”
Section: Present Studymentioning
confidence: 91%