1994
DOI: 10.1128/iai.62.4.1328-1335.1994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in adhesion of Candida albicans 3153A cells exhibiting switch phenotypes to buccal epithelium and stratum corneum

Abstract: Cells of the laboratory strain 3153A of Candida albicans can be stimulated to undergo high-frequency phenotypic switching by a low dose of UV. We have compared the adhesive properties of cells exhibiting the basic original smooth (o-smooth) phenotype and three switch phenotypes (star, irregular wrinkle, and revertant smooth) to buccal epithelium and stratum corneum. The generalized hierarchy of adhesion is as follows: o-smooth > irregular wrinkle > revertant smooth > star. This is the inverse of the hierarchy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
17
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Organisms. C. albicans laboratory strains 3153A (16,17,31,32) and SC5314 (17,33), C. glabrata clinical isolate MRO-084-R (16) were used for the bulk of the studies. C. albicans clinical isolates TW 07229 and TW 072243 (34,35) were generously provided by Theodore C. White, Seattle, WA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisms. C. albicans laboratory strains 3153A (16,17,31,32) and SC5314 (17,33), C. glabrata clinical isolate MRO-084-R (16) were used for the bulk of the studies. C. albicans clinical isolates TW 07229 and TW 072243 (34,35) were generously provided by Theodore C. White, Seattle, WA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In almost every comparison, a profound difference was found. Opaque cells differed from white cells in their sensitivity to neutrophils and reactive oxygen species (Kolitila & Diamond, 1990), adhesion to human cells and plastics (Kennedy et al, 1988;Vargas et al, 1994), secretion of proteinases (Morrow et al, 1992), resistance to antifungals (Vargas et al, 2000) and susceptibility in a Drosophila phagocytosis model (Lohse & Johnson, 2008). White and opaque cells also differed in performance in a yin-yang fashion in two mouse virulence models.…”
Section: Early Ideas About the Role Of Switchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…differentially express the drug-resistance gene CDR4, (18) opaque-phase cells differentially express the drug-resistance gene CDR3 (22) and, while white-phase cells are far more virulent than opaque-phase cells in a mouse tail injection model for systemic infections, (25) opaque-phase cells are far more proficient at colonizing mouse skin than white-phase cells. (26) White-and opaque-phase cells also differ in adhesivity, (27,28) sensitivity to white blood cells and oxidants, (29) and constraints on the bud-hypha transition. (30) When one adds up the variety of phenotypic differences between white-and opaque-phase cells, the pleiotropy proves to be truly remarkable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%