2020
DOI: 10.1080/13825585.2020.1830936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between young and older adults in unity and diversity of executive functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we would like to re-emphasize that the failure to find effects of practice or cognitive reserve in executive function very likely depends on the specific tests and processes. Executive function tasks rely on multiple processes, and although there may be a common factor across tests, there are clearly several different executive control processes grouped under the banner of executive function (e.g., Miyake et al, 2000 ; Glisky et al, 2021 ). Some of these may be modifiable by cognitive reserve or susceptible to practice, others may not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we would like to re-emphasize that the failure to find effects of practice or cognitive reserve in executive function very likely depends on the specific tests and processes. Executive function tasks rely on multiple processes, and although there may be a common factor across tests, there are clearly several different executive control processes grouped under the banner of executive function (e.g., Miyake et al, 2000 ; Glisky et al, 2021 ). Some of these may be modifiable by cognitive reserve or susceptible to practice, others may not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of subsequent studies have supported the three factors of shifting, inhibition and updating presented by Miyake et al 42 by reporting similar three factor solutions from a series of confirmatory factor analyses of diverse cognitive tasks 45,61,72,74 . Other similar confirmatory approaches have resulted in different factor solutions depending on the age group that was investigated [75][76][77][78][79] . To further understand the heterogeneity of findings reported in the literature and the divergence between the results of the EFA in the current study and previous conceptualization, it is important to note here that there is a fundamental difference between confirmatory and exploratory approaches in terms of their use to identify latent factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with age, and how these cognitive changes may interact with an individual’s creative potential, activities, and achievements. Presently, it remains unclear whether specific aspects of executive function may be more vulnerable (or resilient) to cognitive decline, though some evidence suggests that unique subcomponents of executive function become integrated into one common executive function factor with advancing age—a dedifferentiation that reflects widespread disruptions in speeded, goal-directed tasks, and a compensatory tendency to engage preserved knowledge representations over limited cognitive resources (Glisky et al, 2020; Spreng et al, 2017). This is a fruitful area for empirical investigation as long-term exercise participation has been consistently associated with improvements in global executive functioning among cognitively healthy and cognitively impaired older adults (Gomes-Osman et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Cognitive Psychology and Neuroscience Of Creativity In A...mentioning
confidence: 99%