Differences among Rates of Malnutrition Using AND/ASPEN Guidelines and Subjective Global Assessment

Coltman, A.; Peterson, Sarah J.; Sowa, D.

doi:10.1016/j.jand.2015.06.064

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since the publication of the adult malnutrition consensus characteristics (AMC), numerous studies have been published to assess their usability and feasibility. 21,[31][32][33] Usability refers to the ease with which an instrument can be administered, interpreted by the participant, and scored/interpreted by the researcher. 34 A study of feasibility is an examination of a situation to decide if a suggested method, plan, or piece of work is possible or reasonable.…”

Section: Usability and Feasibility Of The Adult Malnutrition Charactementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Coltman et al in 2015 completed a quality improvement project in malnourished patients comparing the AMC to the validated SGA, 25 since both tools use similar criteria for diagnosing malnutrition. 33 A total of 1009 patients were assessed for malnutrition by the SGA and AMC. Thirtytwo patients were classified as malnourished by the SGA but not by the AMC.…”

Section: Validity and Reliability Of The Adult Malnutrition Charactermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since the publication of the adult malnutrition consensus characteristics (AMC), numerous studies have been published to assess their usability and feasibility . Usability refers to the ease with which an instrument can be administered, interpreted by the participant, and scored/interpreted by the researcher .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Consensus Malnutrition Characteristics: Usability and Association With Outcomes

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Malnutrition has been documented in approximately one‐third of patients in developed countries on hospital admission and is associated with negative clinical outcomes. The need to identify and intervene in at‐risk patients is critical to minimize these negative outcomes. A consensus approach for diagnosing and documenting malnutrition in hospitalized adult and pediatric patients was published jointly by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy) and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) in 2012 and 2014, respectively. The purpose of this paper is to review the available literature on the usability, feasibility, validity, and reliability of both the adult and pediatric consensus malnutrition diagnostic approaches, as well as to evaluate their use in studying clinical outcomes. In adults, abstracts and published studies have shown the diagnostic tool is a usable, feasible, and reliable method for the identification of severe and non‐severe or moderate malnutrition. In pediatrics, only 1 published study to date used the pediatric malnutrition indicators, indicating the need to demonstrate that the tool is feasible, valid, and reliable. Both the adult and pediatric tools have shown significant correlation with negative clinical outcomes in malnourished patients, including increased mortality, increased hospital length of stay (adults), increased complications (pediatrics), and increased hospital readmissions. Further large‐scale studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility, usability, validity, and reliability of both the adult and pediatric malnutrition diagnostic approaches.

show abstract

Section: Usability and Feasibility Of The Adult Malnutrition Charactementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Validity and Reliability Of The Adult Malnutrition Charactermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Consensus Malnutrition Characteristics: Usability and Association With Outcomes

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Differences among Rates of Malnutrition Using AND/ASPEN Guidelines and Subjective Global Assessment

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Consensus Malnutrition Characteristics: Usability and Association With Outcomes

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Consensus Malnutrition Characteristics: Usability and Association With Outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About