1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00227838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference in taste quality coding between two cortical taste areas, granular and dysgranular insular areas, in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas the AI was considered not labeled, GI and DI revealed a pattern comparable to the sensory areas. This is compatible with the cytoarchitectural gradients and involvement of insular cortex in somatosensory functions (Ogawa et al 1991(Ogawa et al , 1992Sewards and Sewards 2001, Craig 2002, 2009). …”
Section: Nf-l Content and Myelinationsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Whereas the AI was considered not labeled, GI and DI revealed a pattern comparable to the sensory areas. This is compatible with the cytoarchitectural gradients and involvement of insular cortex in somatosensory functions (Ogawa et al 1991(Ogawa et al , 1992Sewards and Sewards 2001, Craig 2002, 2009). …”
Section: Nf-l Content and Myelinationsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…sweet, salty, sour, bitter and umami. Extracellular recordings in anesthetized rodents [3638,**39,40] have shown that while the majority of taste processing neurons are located in gIC and dIC, neurons in aIC can also display gustatory responses [36,41]. This result is consistent with evidence of direct VPMpc inputs to gIC and dIC and with indications that these two subdivisions might relay gustatory signals to aIC.…”
Section: Coding Of Taste Quality In Icsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Physiological recordings from rats indicate that cortical neurons tend to be heterogeneous in terms of quality coding and breadth-of-responsiveness (e.g. Ogawa et al, 1992; Hanamori et al, 1998; Simon et al, 2006), and similar to the brainstem areas there is some tendency for segregation of primary tastes, including sucrose responses anterodorsally and quinine responses posteriorly (Yamamoto et al, 1985). This latter result was supported by an in vivo surface optical imaging study that reported distinct, yet substantially overlapping activation patterns in response to basic tastes in the rat (Accolla et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%