2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
916
1
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,529 publications
(929 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
916
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, within this subsample, we have three groups of provinces: early switchers, easing into Phase 1 on 11 May, late switchers on 18 May and never switchers (till 25 May). Based on this classification, we can use the [22] decomposition theorem to estimate changes in Phase 1 treatment effects across different subgroups. Our estimates imply stable treatment effects.…”
Section: Further Analysis Of Lockdown Easingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, within this subsample, we have three groups of provinces: early switchers, easing into Phase 1 on 11 May, late switchers on 18 May and never switchers (till 25 May). Based on this classification, we can use the [22] decomposition theorem to estimate changes in Phase 1 treatment effects across different subgroups. Our estimates imply stable treatment effects.…”
Section: Further Analysis Of Lockdown Easingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conclusions are unchanged by defining different pre-treatment periods within the joint lockdown and Phase 0 periods. A second concern that arises, as articulated in [22], is that the treatment effect may not be stable over time. In our context, this means that the expenditure effects of lockdown easing may be different across early-and late-switcher provinces, perhaps indicating that other unobservable time-varying factors are driving the province-level response.…”
Section: Further Analysis Of Lockdown Easingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our main analysis relies on a series of DID event-study analyses, examining the impact of UCC entry into a zip code on a range of outcomes, relative to yet-to-be-treated zip codes. Several authors have shown that when treatment is staggered, standard DID estimates can be biased in the presence of heterogeneous treatment effects (Goodman-Bacon, 2021;de Chaisemartin and d'Haultfoeuille, 2020a,b). Sun and Abraham (2020) show that the estimated coefficients from two-way fixed effect regressions are not robust when there are heterogeneous treatment effects, while Borusyak and Jaravel (2017) show that in this case it is also difficult to identify pre-trends.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary source of data comes from the Censoc project outlined in Goldstein et al (2021). 6 It uses death records from social security administration for individuals who die in old age and implement data-linkage techniques to link with full-count 1940 census records.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%