“…There are some differences in the traditional efficacy of PFo, PCa, and PFr . Currently, extensive investigation of the phytochemical and phytopharmacological research of PFo showed that various compounds have been isolated and identified, including flavonoids, volatile oils, fatty acids, triterpenes, phenolic compounds, and others, − and these aforementioned compounds should be responsible for the antioxidant, antibacterial, anticancer, antiallergic, and antidepressant activities of PFo. − The biological and pharmacological effects including antidiabetic and increasing endometrial receptivity effects of PCa have been confirmed by a number of studies in vitro and in vivo. , These benefits are often attributed to the high content of bioactive compounds, especially phenolic, flavonoids, and essential oil components. , Besides, the PFr also contains many bioactive compounds including phenolic, fatty acids, and flavonoid compounds, , showing excellent antioxidative, antibiotic, and hepatic protection activities. − Although these three different medicinal parts of P. frutescens have many pharmacological effects, their pharmacological effects are quite different.…”