2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0007114516000787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary fat intakes in Irish adults in 2011: how much has changed in 10 years?

Abstract: Imbalances in dietary fat intakes are linked to several chronic diseases. This study describes dietary intakes and food sources of fat and fatty acids in 1051 Irish adults (aged 18-90 years), using data from the 2011 national food consumption survey, the National Adult Nutrition Survey. It also compares current intakes for 18-64-year-olds with those reported in the last such survey in 2001, the North/South Ireland Food Consumption Survey. Dietary fat intakes were estimated using data from 4-d semi-weighed (201… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
30
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
30
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to previous studies, participants in the high processed red meat pattern were typically older and of a lower social class; 29 % were current smokers with a significantly lower AHEI score and dietary fibre intake and greater SFA intakes. This is consistent with the findings of the study by Li et al in which older participants presented greater SFA intakes ( 28 ) . However, unlike other analyses investigating processed red meat and disease risk, the current study had access to a suite of blood biomarkers of CVD and T2D, to complement the dietary intake data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Similar to previous studies, participants in the high processed red meat pattern were typically older and of a lower social class; 29 % were current smokers with a significantly lower AHEI score and dietary fibre intake and greater SFA intakes. This is consistent with the findings of the study by Li et al in which older participants presented greater SFA intakes ( 28 ) . However, unlike other analyses investigating processed red meat and disease risk, the current study had access to a suite of blood biomarkers of CVD and T2D, to complement the dietary intake data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…35 In these studies TFs consumption was higher than 0.491 grams per day median TFs consumption and 28.84 grams per day median fats consumption as reported in our study. 31,[33][34][35] In this study the median fat consumed from snacks in the urban area was 2.12 grams per day, which was marginally higher than 1.59 grams per day in the rural area. In Ghosh et al study, the median fat consumed from snacks with low SES in the urban area was 10.80 grams per day and 1.00 gram per day with low SES in the rural area.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…The mean fats intake was 78.70 grams per day in 18-35 years old females, 72.80 grams/day in 36-50 years old and 71.90 grams per day in 51-64 years old females. 33 In the 2008 national survey in Canada by 24 hour dietary recall in 10583 females 19 years and above, the mean TFs consumption was 2.870 grams per day. 34 In a 2008-2009 national survey in the UK, by four days dietary recall, it was found that mean TFs intake in 434 women in the UK was 1.600 grams per day in 19-64 years old age group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously shown that FFAs cause β cell damage mainly by apoptosis in vitro [7] and by ER stress in mice [8]. The serum composition of FFAs in humans differs from race to race, and from environment to environment, because it reflects the average fat intake in the preceding days [912]. Despite intensive in vitro and in vivo studies to elucidate the impairment of insulin's action induced by chronic elevation of FFAs, however, the physiological interactions whereby the chronic effects of fatty acids on pancreatic beta cells affect insulin's action on glucose and insulin resistance remain unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%