2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary Emulsifier Sodium Stearoyl Lactylate Alters Gut Microbiota in vitro and Inhibits Bacterial Butyrate Producers

Abstract: Dietary emulsifiers are widely used in industrially processed foods, although the effects of these food additives on human gut microbiota are not well studied. Here, we investigated the effects of five different emulsifiers [glycerol monoacetate, glycerol monostearate, glycerol monooleate, propylene glycol monostearate, and sodium stearoyl lactylate (SSL)] on fecal microbiota in vitro. We found that 0.025% (w/v) of SSL reduced the relative abundance of the bacterial class Clostridia and others. The relative ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis was further supported by the studies in humanized gnotobiotic mice model and via anaerobic in vitro culturing in the context of extreme variations of B-vitamin supply ( Sharma et al, 2019 ). The CPI-based functional profiling of HGM samples was applied to several other 16S rRNA metagenomic datasets, including the in vitro fermentation of fecal microbiomes ( Peterson et al, 2019 ; Elmen et al, 2020 ) and the comparative analysis of metabolic properties in microbiomes of infants as a function of breast-feeding vs. formula ( Jones et al, 2020 ), allowing us to link the metabolic phenotypes with variable environmental/growth conditions. Finally, predicted metabolic phenotypes were used for the classification of HGM samples from healthy versus IBD patients providing interpretable insights into the host-microbiome mechanisms of disease ( Iablokov et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis was further supported by the studies in humanized gnotobiotic mice model and via anaerobic in vitro culturing in the context of extreme variations of B-vitamin supply ( Sharma et al, 2019 ). The CPI-based functional profiling of HGM samples was applied to several other 16S rRNA metagenomic datasets, including the in vitro fermentation of fecal microbiomes ( Peterson et al, 2019 ; Elmen et al, 2020 ) and the comparative analysis of metabolic properties in microbiomes of infants as a function of breast-feeding vs. formula ( Jones et al, 2020 ), allowing us to link the metabolic phenotypes with variable environmental/growth conditions. Finally, predicted metabolic phenotypes were used for the classification of HGM samples from healthy versus IBD patients providing interpretable insights into the host-microbiome mechanisms of disease ( Iablokov et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, it is noteworthy that the common dietary emulsifier sodium stearoyl lactylate (SSL) has similar effects on human gut microbiota as IF. Elmén (Elmén et al, 2020) reported that a low concentration of 0.025% (w/v) of SSL already altered the human gut microbiota. Thus, our findings could help to explain the observation that B. longum and B. infantis are better colonizers of breastfed infant guts, while guts of formula-fed infants are more often colonized by E. coli, Clostridium difficile, and B. fragilis group members (Penders et al, 2005(Penders et al, , 2006Yasmin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elmen i wsp. [7] zbadali wpływ pięciu emulgatorów: monooctanu glicerolu (AMG), monostearynianiu glicerolu (GMS), monooleinianiu glicerolu (GMO), monostearynianu glikolu propylowego (PGMS) i stearoilomleczanu sodu (SSL) na mikrobiotę kałową in vitro. Zaobserwowano, że podawanie PGMS, GMS, GMO i SSL doprowadziło do zwiększonej liczebności Enterobacteriaceae i obniżonej liczebności Erysipelotrichaceae.…”
Section: Emulgatoryunclassified
“…Wykazano także silny wpływ SSL na Clostridium spp. Znacząco zostało zmniejszone stężenie maślanu i zwiększone stężenie propionianiu, zwiększone stężenie lipopolisacharydu i flageliny, zwiększając tym samym potencjał prozapalny zbiorowisk bakteryjnych wyselekcjonowanych przez SSL [7]. Miclotte i wsp.…”
Section: Emulgatoryunclassified