2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2017.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary chitosan improves nitrogen use and feed conversion in diets for mid-lactation dairy cows

Abstract: Feed additives and fat sources have been used to meet high productive dairy cow energy requirements. This study aimed to evaluate dietary chitosan and soybean oil effects on mid-lactation dairy cow intake, digestibility, metabolism and productive performance. Twenty-four Holstein cows (134.7 ± 53.1 days in milk, 36.14 ± 5.32 kg/day of milk yield, and 581.2 ± 73.6 kg of body weight, Mean ± SD) were used in a replicated 4×4 Latin square design with 21-d periods, with 14 d of adaptation and 7 d for data collectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
34
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
11
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the DMI level (5.98 kg/d in average) and WRS dietary inclusion (16.3% diet DM), besides physiological state, make the comparisons between experiments not reliable. Our research group evaluated CHI provision to cows fed a diet with soybean oil and we found similar interaction effects observed in the current study, including decreased DMI and milk yield (Del Valle et al, 2017). Thus, the hypothesis that supplementing WRS instead of soybean oil could eliminate the negative effects of CHI and UFA supplementation on performance was not accepted.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the DMI level (5.98 kg/d in average) and WRS dietary inclusion (16.3% diet DM), besides physiological state, make the comparisons between experiments not reliable. Our research group evaluated CHI provision to cows fed a diet with soybean oil and we found similar interaction effects observed in the current study, including decreased DMI and milk yield (Del Valle et al, 2017). Thus, the hypothesis that supplementing WRS instead of soybean oil could eliminate the negative effects of CHI and UFA supplementation on performance was not accepted.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Although CHI presented a similar negative effect of WRS on Butyrivibrio group population, it did not affect CP digestibility and ruminal NH 3 -N concentration, suggesting that B. fibrisolvens was not the major bacteria affected within the Butyrivibrio group. In addition, improvements in CP digestibility have been reported when feeding CHI to lactating cows (Paiva et al, 2016;Del Valle et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Goiri et al [22] investigated the effects of supplementation at 0.36% BW of chitosan and reported no differences in OM and CP digestibility in sheep. Similarly, Del Valle et al [27] reported that the inclusion of 0.4% chitosan in the diet had no effect on digestibility coefficients. With the supplementation of chitosan in lactating cows at 0.4% with whole raw soybeans (WRS), nutrient digestibility was not affected [9], but Paiva et al [28] noted that chitosan provision up to 2.25% BW did not affect DM, DM, EE or NDF digestibility in lactating cows.…”
Section: In Vitro Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The adequacy of diets for the nutritional requirements of food-production animals and the use of feed additives that modify the ruminal environment are common methods used to increase energy retention (Perna et al, 2017) and protein utilization by ruminants (Del Valle et al, 2017). The most used feed additives in animal nutrition are ionophores antibiotics, non-ionophores antibiotics and probiotics (Nicodemo, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%