1995
DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.1995.1015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet Optimization with a Nutrient or Toxin Constraint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DRM was developed for predators feeding on prey with indigestible bulk, and predicts that energy intake rate of predators depends on the digestive rate, which makes processing time rather than search/handling time the limiting factor (Verlinden and Wiley, 1989;Hirakawa, 1995;van Gils et al, 2005b). The subjects of the present study are well-known digestively constrained predators limited by the amount of shell mass that can be processed per unit time (Piersma et al, 1993a;van Gils et al, 2003;van Gils et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DRM was developed for predators feeding on prey with indigestible bulk, and predicts that energy intake rate of predators depends on the digestive rate, which makes processing time rather than search/handling time the limiting factor (Verlinden and Wiley, 1989;Hirakawa, 1995;van Gils et al, 2005b). The subjects of the present study are well-known digestively constrained predators limited by the amount of shell mass that can be processed per unit time (Piersma et al, 1993a;van Gils et al, 2003;van Gils et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We restricted our analyses in this paper to these six prey species. Prey too large to be ingested were excluded, applying [16,29,30]. This model accurately predicted the diet of red knots, under both experimental and field conditions [16,17,31].…”
Section: (A) Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model accurately predicted the diet of red knots, under both experimental and field conditions [16,17,31]. For mathematical details, we refer to Hirakawa [30] or van Gils et al [16], but we will briefly review the basics here. When multiple prey types are available, the DRM predicts the optimal diet composition that maximizes long-term average energy intake rate (Y in electronic supplementary material, table S1) under the constraints of finding, handling and digesting prey.…”
Section: (A) Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even in herbivores (Hirakawa 1997a;Verlinden and Wiley 1989) and molluscivores (van Gils et al 2005;Quaintenne et al 2010) that have essentially immobile prey, optimal foraging theory fails to predict the observed diet preferences. In these cases, the digestive rate model (DRM; Verlinden and Wiley 1989;Hirakawa 1995Hirakawa , 1997b) is shown to better predict animal diet preference, but the DRM itself is the result of generalizing the prey model (i.e., rate maximization) to include the effect of digestive constraints.…”
Section: Consequentlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DRM of Hirakawa (1995) is a correction of related foraging constraint models from Pulliam (1974), Stephens and Krebs (1986), and Verlinden and Wiley (1989). It maximizes the same rate expression from Eq.…”
Section: Consequentlymentioning
confidence: 99%