Economic design in a long-distance migrating molluscivore: how fast-fuelling red knots in Bohai Bay, China, get away with small gizzards

Abstract

SUMMARYWe carried out an observational and experimental study to decipher how resource characteristics, in interaction with the predator's phenotype, constrain a fitness-determining performance measure, i.e. refuelling in a migrant bird. Two subspecies of red knot (Calidris canutus rogersi and C. c. piersmai) use northern Bohai Bay, Yellow Sea, China, for the final prebreeding stopover, during their 10,000-15,000km long migrations between wintering and breeding areas. Here, they feed on small bivalves, especially 2-7mm long Potamocorbula laevis. With an average stay of 29days, and the need to store 80g of fat for the onward flights to high-Arctic breeding grounds, red knots need to refuel fast. Using existing knowledge, we expected them to achieve this on the basis of (1) prey with high flesh to shell mass ratios, (2) large gizzards to crush the ingested molluscs, or (3) a combination of the two. Rejecting all three predictions, we found that red knots staging in Bohai Bay had the smallest gizzards on record (4.9±0.8g, mean ± s.e.m., N=27), and also found that prey quality of P. laevis is much lower than predicted for the measured gizzard size (i.e. 1.3 rather than the predicted 4.5kJg -1 dry shell mass, DM shell ). The estimated handling time of P. laevis (0.2s) is much shorter than the observed time between two prey ingestions (0.7s), indicating that prey handling time is no constraint. Based on field observations of dropping rates and on indoor digestion trails, the shell processing rate was estimated at 3.9mg DM shell s -1 , i.e. three times higher the rate previously predicted for red knots eating as fast as they can with the measured gizzard size. This is explained by the small and easily crushed P. laevis enabling high processing rates. As P. laevis also occurred in high densities, the metabolizable energy intake rate of red knots with small gizzards at 5Js -1 was as high as at northward staging sites elsewhere in the world. Currently, therefore, food characteristics in Bohai Bay are such that red knots can refuel fast whilst economizing on the size of their gizzard. These time-stressed migrants thus provide an elegant example of symmorphosis. Supplementary material available online at

Spare capacity and phenotypic flexibility in the digestive system of a migratory bird: defining the limits of animal design

“…In sum, adjustments in gut size of a variety of vertebrates require at least a few days, and perhaps as much as one week, depending on body size and type of digestive change [19,42,54]. For actively migrating birds that fast while flying and must stop to feed and refuel, this pace of digestive change may often be too slow, and so digestive constraints may directly retard the pace of migration [42,77,78].…”

Ways to be different: foraging adaptations that facilitate higher intake rates in a northerly-wintering shorebird compared to a low-latitude conspecific

“…2). We back-transformed these estimates to yield outputs in mg. To link intake to metabolizable energy, we converted estimates of shell ballast intake into their energetic equivalent (kJ g −1 shell ballast) assuming an energy density of 22 kJ g −1 AFDM Macoma flesh (van Gils et al, 2005b;Zwarts and Wanink, 1993) and an assimilation efficiency of 0.8 (Yang et al, 2013).…”

“…During the nonbreeding season, shorebirds experience high energetic demands (Kersten and Piersma, 1987;Wiersma and Piersma, 1994), a natural history trait that also makes shorebirds ideal study subjects of the interplay between an organism's foraging ecology and its energetic requirements (Kvist and Lindström, 2003;van Gils et al, 2005a;Yang et al, 2013). Previous studies of intake rates in shorebirds have demonstrated that they rapidly increase with prey density, but quickly reach an asymptote beyond which intake rates stabilize.…”

“…Because molluscivorous shorebirds efficiently exploit prey even at relatively low densities , their energy intake rates are not typically limited by their ability to find or handle prey but instead by the interaction between the size of their gizzard and the quality [i.e. energy per unit shell mass (kJ g −1 )] of the prey itself (Yang et al, 2013;Zwarts and Blomert, 1992). The interaction of these factors provides a fruitful experimental context to explore the life-history consequences of these traits within and among species (Dekinga et al, 2001;Piersma et al, 2003;Quaintenne et al, 2010;van Gils et al, 2003avan Gils et al, , 2005a.…”

Red Knot diet reconstruction revisited: context dependence revealed by experiments at Banc d'Arguin, Mauritania

“…Shell thickness and resistance to crushing vary among species of molluscs (Cabral & Jorge 2007) and even among seasons (Nagarajan et al 2006). As Dosinia and especially Loripes are thin-shelled prey that can be crushed easily (Yang et al 2013), we were concerned that a large fraction of shell mass in droppings is lost in the sieving process given the fixed mesh of 300-μm used by . We expect this fraction to be larger than the fractions found by for more thick-shelled prey from the Wadden Sea.…”