2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13364-016-0268-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet of the puku antelope (Kobus vardonii) and dietary overlap with selected other bovids in Kasanka National Park, Zambia

Abstract: Diet and dietary competition among puku (Kobus vardonii) and other grazing bovids were investigated in Kasanka National Park, Zambia, a prime area for puku. The objective was to provide new insights into the puku's feeding ecology including autecological and synecological traits. Other bovids assessed for their diets were sitatunga (Tragelaphus spekii), reedbuck (Redunca arundinum), Lichtenstein's hartebeest (Alcelaphus lichtensteinii), sable antelope (Hippotragus niger) and African buffalo (Syncerus caffer). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Puku feed on grasses (Rduch, 2016a), and as the grass layer decreases with less rainfall, grazers are more affected by changes in rainfall than browsers (Leeuwis et al, 2018). At least three years before the survey 2009–2010, starting from the rainy season 2006–2007, KasNP had high, above‐average rainfalls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Puku feed on grasses (Rduch, 2016a), and as the grass layer decreases with less rainfall, grazers are more affected by changes in rainfall than browsers (Leeuwis et al, 2018). At least three years before the survey 2009–2010, starting from the rainy season 2006–2007, KasNP had high, above‐average rainfalls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Puku feed on grasses (Rduch, 2016a), and as the grass layer decreases with less rainfall, grazers are more affected by changes in rainfall than browsers (Leeuwis et al, 2018). comm., 30 Jan 2020).…”
Section: Difference In %mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The anatomical data was evaluated using three additional data sets reflecting the natural diet, and the digestive physiology. The natural diet is typically described as the percentage of grass in the natural diet (%grass; Clauss, Kaiser, & Hummel, ) and was available for all species investigated (Akbari, Moradi, Rezaie, & Baghestani, ; Clauss et al, ; Clauss, Hofmann, et al, ; Dittmann, Hummel, et al, ; Gagnon & Chew, ; Meier et al, ; Müller et al, ; Rduch, ; Serbent, Periago, & Leynaud, ; Zerbe et al, ). In order to achieve more convenient parameter estimates for the natural diet, we expressed %grass in this study as the proportion of grass (i.e., ranging from 0 to 1 rather than from 0 to 100).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%